1990•VTI RapportRequires access

WARNING LIGHTS ON SERVICE VEHICLES IN WORK ZONES. PROCEEDINGS OF STRATEGIC HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM AND TRAFFIC SAFETY ON TWO CONTINENTS, GOTHENBURG, SWEDEN, 27-29 SEPTEMBER, 1989

Richard F. Pain, FR Hanscom

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Warning lights on service vehicles in moving and short-term work zone operations serve as part of and sometimes as the primary traffic control scheme. This paper reports on a study examining driver information needs in these work zone situations, the impact of various warning light parameters on selected driver behaviors and the effectiveness of several warning light systems in short-term and moving work zone operations. Various lighting systems (i.e., strobes, rotating lights, flashing lights and a light bar were field tested. Closed test track results indicated that certain characteristicks (e.g., flash rate, number of lights, medium versus high intensity) had little effect on driver closing rate and speed estimating performance. These tests confirmed the importance of information transmission (e.g., directional arrow) in addition to conspicuity. Test track findings also demonstrated that the slower the maintenance vehicle travelled, the more difficulty drivers had in judging closing rate when approaching the rear of the service vehicle. Actual highway observations were conducted in simulated maintenance activities in three states. Results obtained for stationary short-term lane closures suggest use of rotating light and flashing light combinations in service vehicles. Arrow boards were effective for lane closures. The product of this research was guidelines for warning light use on service vehicles in eleven categories of short-term and moving work zone operations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Warning lights on service vehicles in moving and short-term work zone operations serve as part of and sometimes as the primary traffic control scheme. This paper reports on a study examining driver information needs in these work zone situations, the impact of various warning light parameters on selected driver behaviors and the effectiveness of several warning light systems in short-term and moving work zone operations. Various lighting systems (i.e., strobes, rotating lights, flashing lights and a light bar were field tested. Closed test track results indicated that certain characteristicks (e.g., flash rate, number of lights, medium versus high intensity) had little effect on driver closing rate and speed estimating performance. These tests confirmed the importance of information transmission (e.g., directional arrow) in addition to conspicuity. Test track findings also demonstrated that the slower the maintenance vehicle travelled, the more difficulty drivers had in judging closing rate when approaching the rear of the service vehicle. Actual highway observations were conducted in simulated maintenance activities in three states. Results obtained for stationary short-term lane closures suggest use of rotating light and flashing light combinations in service vehicles. Arrow boards were effective for lane closures. The product of this research was guidelines for warning light use on service vehicles in eleven categories of short-term and moving work zone operations.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Warning lights on service vehicles in moving and short-term work zone operations serve as part of and sometimes as the primary traffic control scheme. This paper reports on a study examining driver information needs in these work zone situations, the impact of various warning light parameters on selected driver behaviors and the effectiveness of several warning light systems in short-term and moving work zone operations. Various lighting systems (i.e., strobes, rotating lights, flashing lights and a light bar were field tested. Closed test track results indicated that certain characteristicks (e.g., flash rate, number of lights, medium versus high intensity) had little effect on driver closing rate and speed estimating performance. These tests confirmed the importance of information transmission (e.g., directional arrow) in addition to conspicuity. Test track findings also demonstrated that the slower the maintenance vehicle travelled, the more difficulty drivers had in judging closing rate when approaching the rear of the service vehicle. Actual highway observations were conducted in simulated maintenance activities in three states. Results obtained for stationary short-term lane closures suggest use of rotating light and flashing light combinations in service vehicles. Arrow boards were effective for lane closures. The product of this research was guidelines for warning light use on service vehicles in eleven categories of short-term and moving work zone operations.

Key concepts: Flashing, Work zone, Transport engineering, Work (physics), Service (business), Track (disk drive), Windshield, Warning system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
WARNING LIGHTS ON SERVICE VEHICLES IN WORK ZONES. PROCEEDINGS OF STRATEGIC HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM AND TRAFFIC SAFETY ON TWO CONTINENTS, GOTHENBURG, SWEDEN, 27-29 SEPTEMBER, 1989 — Research Paper | ScholarLens