1992•Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

EVALUATION OF CALIFORNIA PROFILOGRAPH

Larry Scofield, Sylvester A. Kalevela, Mary R. Anderson

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The Arizona Department of Transportation evaluates portland cement concrete pavements by testing with mechanical as well as electronic profilographs. The precision of the two types of profilograph was evaluated. More than 100 profilograph runs were conducted on a selected pavement section. The range of replicate readings of pavement profile index could be as much as 2.0 in./mi for a rough pavement. Electronic profilographs adjusted to operate at low filter settings gave lower profile index values than those obtained with the same profilographs at higher filter settings.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Arizona Department of Transportation evaluates portland cement concrete pavements by testing with mechanical as well as electronic profilographs. The precision of the two types of profilograph was evaluated. More than 100 profilograph runs were conducted on a selected pavement section. The range of replicate readings of pavement profile index could be as much as 2.0 in./mi for a rough pavement. Electronic profilographs adjusted to operate at low filter settings gave lower profile index values than those obtained with the same profilographs at higher filter settings.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Arizona Department of Transportation evaluates portland cement concrete pavements by testing with mechanical as well as electronic profilographs. The precision of the two types of profilograph was evaluated. More than 100 profilograph runs were conducted on a selected pavement section. The range of replicate readings of pavement profile index could be as much as 2.0 in./mi for a rough pavement. Electronic profilographs adjusted to operate at low filter settings gave lower profile index values than those obtained with the same profilographs at higher filter settings.

Key concepts: Portland cement, Range (aeronautics), Index (typography), Engineering, Environmental science, Geotechnical engineering, Forensic engineering, Civil engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EVALUATION OF CALIFORNIA PROFILOGRAPH — Research Paper | ScholarLens