2012SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Suppliers’ Performance Evaluation and Ranking in a Supply Chain: An Analytical Hierarchy Process-Based Approach

Rajkumar Ohdar, Pradip Kumar Ray

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Companies are now encouraging the outsourcing of their non-core activities, and are concentrating and allocating more resources on core activities that influence their dependence more on supplies. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation which depends on several criteria, including both quantitative and qualitative criteria. This paper presents how an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based model is formulated and applied to a real case study for supplier performance evaluation and ranking. Four key criteria have been identified in the supplier performance evaluation process, using Pareto analysis. The suppliers are ranked based on the priority weights calculated for each supplier. The three top ranked suppliers are selected and the weak criteria associated with these suppliers are also identified.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Companies are now encouraging the outsourcing of their non-core activities, and are concentrating and allocating more resources on core activities that influence their dependence more on supplies. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation which depends on several criteria, including both quantitative and qualitative criteria. This paper presents how an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based model is formulated and applied to a real case study for supplier performance evaluation and ranking. Four key criteria have been identified in the supplier performance evaluation process, using Pareto analysis. The suppliers are ranked based on the priority weights calculated for each supplier. The three top ranked suppliers are selected and the weak criteria associated with these suppliers are also identified.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Companies are now encouraging the outsourcing of their non-core activities, and are concentrating and allocating more resources on core activities that influence their dependence more on supplies. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation which depends on several criteria, including both quantitative and qualitative criteria. This paper presents how an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based model is formulated and applied to a real case study for supplier performance evaluation and ranking. Four key criteria have been identified in the supplier performance evaluation process, using Pareto analysis. The suppliers are ranked based on the priority weights calculated for each supplier. The three top ranked suppliers are selected and the weak criteria associated with these suppliers are also identified.

Key concepts: Ranking (information retrieval), Analytic hierarchy process, Outsourcing, Supplier evaluation, Supplier relationship management, Supply chain, Selection (genetic algorithm), Core (optical fiber)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Suppliers’ Performance Evaluation and Ranking in a Supply Chain: An Analytical Hierarchy Process-Based Approach — Research Paper | ScholarLens