2014Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)Open access

The joint effect of typicality and novelty on aesthetic pleasure for product designs: Influences of safety and risk

Janneke Blijlevens, Paul Hekkert, Clementine Thurgood

Open full text 15 citations

Abstract

While some studies have shown that people prefer typical product designs, others have shown that people also like product designs that are new. To reconcile these contradictory findings, the design principle, ‘Most Advanced, Yet Acceptable’ proposes that people prefer a balance of both typicality and novelty in product designs. As an explanation, we propose that typicality and novelty fulfil basic evolutionary needs for safety and exploration that still drive behaviour today, and that products are most preferred when they satisfy both of these needs simultaneously. We further propose that conditions of safety and risk will drive product preferences towards novelty and typicality, respectively. Overall, this research will provide insights into when and why aesthetic preferences for typicality or novelty occur.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

While some studies have shown that people prefer typical product designs, others have shown that people also like product designs that are new. To reconcile these contradictory findings, the design principle, ‘Most Advanced, Yet Acceptable’ proposes that people prefer a balance of both typicality and novelty in product designs. As an explanation, we propose that typicality and novelty fulfil basic evolutionary needs for safety and exploration that still drive behaviour today, and that products are most preferred when they satisfy both of these needs simultaneously. We further propose that conditions of safety and risk will drive product preferences towards novelty and typicality, respectively. Overall, this research will provide insights into when and why aesthetic preferences for typicality or novelty occur.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

While some studies have shown that people prefer typical product designs, others have shown that people also like product designs that are new. To reconcile these contradictory findings, the design principle, ‘Most Advanced, Yet Acceptable’ proposes that people prefer a balance of both typicality and novelty in product designs. As an explanation, we propose that typicality and novelty fulfil basic evolutionary needs for safety and exploration that still drive behaviour today, and that products are most preferred when they satisfy both of these needs simultaneously. We further propose that conditions of safety and risk will drive product preferences towards novelty and typicality, respectively. Overall, this research will provide insights into when and why aesthetic preferences for typicality or novelty occur.

Key concepts: Novelty, Pleasure, Product (mathematics), Product design, Risk analysis (engineering), Computer science, Joint (building), New product development

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The joint effect of typicality and novelty on aesthetic pleasure for product designs: Influences of safety and risk — Research Paper | ScholarLens