1985Surveyor magazineRequires access

HIGH PATRONAGE, LOW COST BUS SERVICES

Alan W. Evans

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The author uses an economic model of bus operations to study the trial deregulation of bus services in Hereford during 1981-84. The model gives estimates of bus patronage, revenue, expenditure, etc., for a geographical area in terms of the average fare and the number of bus vehicle-miles per year operated in the area, and in terms of the area's population, car ownership, and population density. The model was developed by the author using county-level data for 36 counties for 1982-3. Details of the population, car ownership, and population density of Hereford were used, together with the bus vehicle-miles and fare levels prevailing at different dates. The model operates in a broad-brush way: it does not take account of the details of the routes in any area, and it assumes average efficiency by bus operators. In November 1983 both public and private operators would have been making large losses. For both types of operator expenditure would have risen, owing to the extra vehicle-miles being operated, and revenue would have fallen, owing to the very low fares, in spite of the extra patronage. The model estimates that the public-sector operator would have been making a loss equivalent to 450000 per year, and the private-sector operators a loss equivalent to L219000 per year. Although the operators would have been making large losses in November 1983, the value of the gains to the passengers would have more than outweighed the losses to the operators, so that net economic benefit would have been up by 22%. Assuming that the model is correct, the operators would have incurred similar deficits in 1984.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The author uses an economic model of bus operations to study the trial deregulation of bus services in Hereford during 1981-84. The model gives estimates of bus patronage, revenue, expenditure, etc., for a geographical area in terms of the average fare and the number of bus vehicle-miles per year operated in the area, and in terms of the area's population, car ownership, and population density. The model was developed by the author using county-level data for 36 counties for 1982-3. Details of the population, car ownership, and population density of Hereford were used, together with the bus vehicle-miles and fare levels prevailing at different dates. The model operates in a broad-brush way: it does not take account of the details of the routes in any area, and it assumes average efficiency by bus operators. In November 1983 both public and private operators would have been making large losses. For both types of operator expenditure would have risen, owing to the extra vehicle-miles being operated, and revenue would have fallen, owing to the very low fares, in spite of the extra patronage. The model estimates that the public-sector operator would have been making a loss equivalent to 450000 per year, and the private-sector operators a loss equivalent to L219000 per year. Although the operators would have been making large losses in November 1983, the value of the gains to the passengers would have more than outweighed the losses to the operators, so that net economic benefit would have been up by 22%. Assuming that the model is correct, the operators would have incurred similar deficits in 1984.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The author uses an economic model of bus operations to study the trial deregulation of bus services in Hereford during 1981-84. The model gives estimates of bus patronage, revenue, expenditure, etc., for a geographical area in terms of the average fare and the number of bus vehicle-miles per year operated in the area, and in terms of the area's population, car ownership, and population density. The model was developed by the author using county-level data for 36 counties for 1982-3. Details of the population, car ownership, and population density of Hereford were used, together with the bus vehicle-miles and fare levels prevailing at different dates. The model operates in a broad-brush way: it does not take account of the details of the routes in any area, and it assumes average efficiency by bus operators. In November 1983 both public and private operators would have been making large losses. For both types of operator expenditure would have risen, owing to the extra vehicle-miles being operated, and revenue would have fallen, owing to the very low fares, in spite of the extra patronage. The model estimates that the public-sector operator would have been making a loss equivalent to 450000 per year, and the private-sector operators a loss equivalent to L219000 per year. Although the operators would have been making large losses in November 1983, the value of the gains to the passengers would have more than outweighed the losses to the operators, so that net economic benefit would have been up by 22%. Assuming that the model is correct, the operators would have incurred similar deficits in 1984.

Key concepts: Revenue, Public transport, Population, Deregulation, Transport engineering, Business, Operator (biology), Agricultural economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
HIGH PATRONAGE, LOW COST BUS SERVICES — Research Paper | ScholarLens