2002Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)Requires access

PROTECTING PEDESTRIANS IN VEHICLE COLLISIONS: RESULTS FROM 2 YEARS OF THE AUSTRALIAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE ANALYSIS OF ACTUAL ACCIDENTS

Marleen Sommariva, G Ponte, Luke Streeter, Robert Anderson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The Australian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) has included the evaluation of vehicles' ability to protect pedestrians from injury, should a collision occur, since the year 2000. At the time of writing the results from 19 cars tested by RARU have been published by ANCAP, along with results of tests carried out to the same protocol by EuroNCAP. This paper will present a detailed analysis and summary of the results of the ANCAP testing, against the background of the analysis of actual accidents. Cars have generally performed poorly in these tests when measured against the requirements placed on them by ANCAP, although the experience of testing has demonstrated ways in which the designs of cars could be altered to improve the results of ANCAP tests, suggesting future trends in the design of vehicles for pedestrian protection. Meanwhile the analysis of actual accident data would seem to support the focus on these body regions by ANCAP. The reconstruction of actual collisions using the same testing protocol indicates that the risk of head injury predicted by the ANCAP protocol is valid. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E209619.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Australian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) has included the evaluation of vehicles' ability to protect pedestrians from injury, should a collision occur, since the year 2000. At the time of writing the results from 19 cars tested by RARU have been published by ANCAP, along with results of tests carried out to the same protocol by EuroNCAP. This paper will present a detailed analysis and summary of the results of the ANCAP testing, against the background of the analysis of actual accidents. Cars have generally performed poorly in these tests when measured against the requirements placed on them by ANCAP, although the experience of testing has demonstrated ways in which the designs of cars could be altered to improve the results of ANCAP tests, suggesting future trends in the design of vehicles for pedestrian protection. Meanwhile the analysis of actual accident data would seem to support the focus on these body regions by ANCAP. The reconstruction of actual collisions using the same testing protocol indicates that the risk of head injury predicted by the ANCAP protocol is valid. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E209619.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Australian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) has included the evaluation of vehicles' ability to protect pedestrians from injury, should a collision occur, since the year 2000. At the time of writing the results from 19 cars tested by RARU have been published by ANCAP, along with results of tests carried out to the same protocol by EuroNCAP. This paper will present a detailed analysis and summary of the results of the ANCAP testing, against the background of the analysis of actual accidents. Cars have generally performed poorly in these tests when measured against the requirements placed on them by ANCAP, although the experience of testing has demonstrated ways in which the designs of cars could be altered to improve the results of ANCAP tests, suggesting future trends in the design of vehicles for pedestrian protection. Meanwhile the analysis of actual accident data would seem to support the focus on these body regions by ANCAP. The reconstruction of actual collisions using the same testing protocol indicates that the risk of head injury predicted by the ANCAP protocol is valid. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E209619.

Key concepts: Pedestrian, Transport engineering, Engineering, Protocol (science), Collision, Poison control, Vehicle safety, Accident analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PROTECTING PEDESTRIANS IN VEHICLE COLLISIONS: RESULTS FROM 2 YEARS OF THE AUSTRALIAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE ANALYSIS OF ACTUAL ACCIDENTS — Research Paper | ScholarLens