2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of VitriBlast™ for vitrification of immature oocytes

Fatma Gülen Yaldir

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Cryopreservation of gametes and embryos is crucial in fertility treatment and fertility preservation. Preservation of oocytes is a more complicated process than preservation of sperm and embryos. According to recent studies, a new preservation technique called vitrification is found to have higher rates of oocytes-survival after warming The aim of this study was to evaluate VitriBlast™ Kit, for vitrification of oocytes. Vitrification is an ultra-rapid freezing method in the presence with of high concentrations of cryoprotectants which avoids intracellular ice-crystal formation during the freezing and warming process. In this study, a total number of 117 immature oocytes were used and 62 of these oocytes were vitrified with VitroBlast™ Kit. During this process two different vitrification devices were used, VitroLoop™ and Cryopette®. After warming, the average survival rate for vitrified oocytes was found to be 61% for VitroLoop™ and 15% for Cryopette® (p<0.001). The remaining 55 oocytes were used as a non-frozen control group and the same incubation method as for vitrified oocytes was used. The survival rate for the control groups was higher than for the vitrified groups (93% versus 35%, p<0.001). The results of this study indicate that VitriBlast™ Kit is not suitable for vitrification of oocytes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cryopreservation of gametes and embryos is crucial in fertility treatment and fertility preservation. Preservation of oocytes is a more complicated process than preservation of sperm and embryos. According to recent studies, a new preservation technique called vitrification is found to have higher rates of oocytes-survival after warming The aim of this study was to evaluate VitriBlast™ Kit, for vitrification of oocytes. Vitrification is an ultra-rapid freezing method in the presence with of high concentrations of cryoprotectants which avoids intracellular ice-crystal formation during the freezing and warming process. In this study, a total number of 117 immature oocytes were used and 62 of these oocytes were vitrified with VitroBlast™ Kit. During this process two different vitrification devices were used, VitroLoop™ and Cryopette®. After warming, the average survival rate for vitrified oocytes was found to be 61% for VitroLoop™ and 15% for Cryopette® (p<0.001). The remaining 55 oocytes were used as a non-frozen control group and the same incubation method as for vitrified oocytes was used. The survival rate for the control groups was higher than for the vitrified groups (93% versus 35%, p<0.001). The results of this study indicate that VitriBlast™ Kit is not suitable for vitrification of oocytes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cryopreservation of gametes and embryos is crucial in fertility treatment and fertility preservation. Preservation of oocytes is a more complicated process than preservation of sperm and embryos. According to recent studies, a new preservation technique called vitrification is found to have higher rates of oocytes-survival after warming The aim of this study was to evaluate VitriBlast™ Kit, for vitrification of oocytes. Vitrification is an ultra-rapid freezing method in the presence with of high concentrations of cryoprotectants which avoids intracellular ice-crystal formation during the freezing and warming process. In this study, a total number of 117 immature oocytes were used and 62 of these oocytes were vitrified with VitroBlast™ Kit. During this process two different vitrification devices were used, VitroLoop™ and Cryopette®. After warming, the average survival rate for vitrified oocytes was found to be 61% for VitroLoop™ and 15% for Cryopette® (p<0.001). The remaining 55 oocytes were used as a non-frozen control group and the same incubation method as for vitrified oocytes was used. The survival rate for the control groups was higher than for the vitrified groups (93% versus 35%, p<0.001). The results of this study indicate that VitriBlast™ Kit is not suitable for vitrification of oocytes.

Key concepts: Vitrification, Cryoprotectant, Cryopreservation, Andrology, Fertility preservation, Oocyte, Cryobiology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of VitriBlast™ for vitrification of immature oocytes — Research Paper | ScholarLens