2010Transportation Research Board 89th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

Transport in the Global Carbon Market: Baseline Challenges with Sectoral No-Lose Targets

Adam Millard‐Ball

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Sectoral no-lose targets have been proposed as a mechanism to engage developing countries in a new international climate agreement. Countries would generate tradable emission credits for reducing emissions below a “crediting baseline,” most likely set as a percentage reduction from business-as-usual. For transport, proposals to date have been largely conceptual. This paper provides a detailed look at how sectoral no-lose targets might be implemented, with particular attention to how the crediting baseline might be set. It concludes that uncertainties in projecting business-as-usual emissions pose serious problems for the feasibility of sectoral no-lose targets for transport. Based on a regression model using historical data, some countries would be likely to generate large volumes of tradable emission credits without taking any action, simply due to imprecision in the business-as-usual projections.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sectoral no-lose targets have been proposed as a mechanism to engage developing countries in a new international climate agreement. Countries would generate tradable emission credits for reducing emissions below a “crediting baseline,” most likely set as a percentage reduction from business-as-usual. For transport, proposals to date have been largely conceptual. This paper provides a detailed look at how sectoral no-lose targets might be implemented, with particular attention to how the crediting baseline might be set. It concludes that uncertainties in projecting business-as-usual emissions pose serious problems for the feasibility of sectoral no-lose targets for transport. Based on a regression model using historical data, some countries would be likely to generate large volumes of tradable emission credits without taking any action, simply due to imprecision in the business-as-usual projections.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sectoral no-lose targets have been proposed as a mechanism to engage developing countries in a new international climate agreement. Countries would generate tradable emission credits for reducing emissions below a “crediting baseline,” most likely set as a percentage reduction from business-as-usual. For transport, proposals to date have been largely conceptual. This paper provides a detailed look at how sectoral no-lose targets might be implemented, with particular attention to how the crediting baseline might be set. It concludes that uncertainties in projecting business-as-usual emissions pose serious problems for the feasibility of sectoral no-lose targets for transport. Based on a regression model using historical data, some countries would be likely to generate large volumes of tradable emission credits without taking any action, simply due to imprecision in the business-as-usual projections.

Key concepts: Baseline (sea), Business as usual, Greenhouse gas, Set (abstract data type), Business, Action (physics), Economics, Emissions trading

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transport in the Global Carbon Market: Baseline Challenges with Sectoral No-Lose Targets — Research Paper | ScholarLens