CAPITAL SCHEMES. THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AND ROAD SCHEMES IN LONDON
D Mathew
Abstract
D Mathew
Abstract
Historically there have been two basic schools of thought on the question of road schemes. One maintains traffic growth as an inexorable process which cannot be halted and therefore requires new roads to be built and existing ones to be widened where possible. This booklet argues in support of the alternative view that such measures are self defeating since new roads will generate more traffic. As a result the urban area will be permanently congested, the environment will deteriorate, and parking become impossible. It is suggested that the way forward lies in better public transport, restraining excess traffic, and considering the needs of local people. (TRRL)
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Historically there have been two basic schools of thought on the question of road schemes. One maintains traffic growth as an inexorable process which cannot be halted and therefore requires new roads to be built and existing ones to be widened where possible. This booklet argues in support of the alternative view that such measures are self defeating since new roads will generate more traffic. As a result the urban area will be permanently congested, the environment will deteriorate, and parking become impossible. It is suggested that the way forward lies in better public transport, restraining excess traffic, and considering the needs of local people. (TRRL)
Key concepts: Transport engineering, Public transport, Process (computing), Road traffic, Traffic congestion, Capital (architecture), Business, Computer science