2006Journal of transportation law, logistics, and policyRequires access

Ending the Federal Financing of State Highways

Gabriel Roth

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The passage of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users raises several important questions about highway financing. This paper discusses ether there are better ways to finance and provide highways and examines what the role of the federal government should be in highway financing. In the current system, the federal government uses revenue from the Highway Trust Fund to reimburse state governments for the federal share of expenditures previously made by the states. The author concludes that this system shows a lack of accountability both the members of Congress and states, enables low-priority projects to be financed, and discourages innovation and flexibility. These problems could be reduced by applying market pricing and investment principles to roads. Reform should start with the phasing out of federal financing of state roads. This would give states full financial responsibility for their roads, allowing them to introduce charges they consider appropriate. The paper concludes by suggesting strategies for overcoming opposition to this reform.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The passage of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users raises several important questions about highway financing. This paper discusses ether there are better ways to finance and provide highways and examines what the role of the federal government should be in highway financing. In the current system, the federal government uses revenue from the Highway Trust Fund to reimburse state governments for the federal share of expenditures previously made by the states. The author concludes that this system shows a lack of accountability both the members of Congress and states, enables low-priority projects to be financed, and discourages innovation and flexibility. These problems could be reduced by applying market pricing and investment principles to roads. Reform should start with the phasing out of federal financing of state roads. This would give states full financial responsibility for their roads, allowing them to introduce charges they consider appropriate. The paper concludes by suggesting strategies for overcoming opposition to this reform.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The passage of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users raises several important questions about highway financing. This paper discusses ether there are better ways to finance and provide highways and examines what the role of the federal government should be in highway financing. In the current system, the federal government uses revenue from the Highway Trust Fund to reimburse state governments for the federal share of expenditures previously made by the states. The author concludes that this system shows a lack of accountability both the members of Congress and states, enables low-priority projects to be financed, and discourages innovation and flexibility. These problems could be reduced by applying market pricing and investment principles to roads. Reform should start with the phasing out of federal financing of state roads. This would give states full financial responsibility for their roads, allowing them to introduce charges they consider appropriate. The paper concludes by suggesting strategies for overcoming opposition to this reform.

Key concepts: Finance, Revenue, Equity (law), Opposition (politics), Accountability, Business, State (computer science), Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ending the Federal Financing of State Highways — Research Paper | ScholarLens