1992Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

PRACTICES AND NEEDS IN WORK ZONE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY

E C Noel

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Practices in controlling and protecting pedestrians in work zones are investigated in this paper. The information presented is based on research conducted in the development of the report Zone Traffic Management Synthesis: Work Zone Pedestrian Protection (Report No. DTFH61-88-X-00007-3, FHWA, Dec. 1988). The findings and recommendations are based on interviews, literature review, and field observations of highway, building construction, and maintenance projects in several cities. Good practice in protecting pedestrians in work zones is sporadic. Many cities, including high population centers, have no documented and comprehensive pedestrian safety standards for contractors to follow. Improvement of Part VI of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD) (FHWA, 1984), to include information on how to accommodate and protect pedestrians in work sites, has the greatest potential for promoting good practice. Ideas for such improvement are presented.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Practices in controlling and protecting pedestrians in work zones are investigated in this paper. The information presented is based on research conducted in the development of the report Zone Traffic Management Synthesis: Work Zone Pedestrian Protection (Report No. DTFH61-88-X-00007-3, FHWA, Dec. 1988). The findings and recommendations are based on interviews, literature review, and field observations of highway, building construction, and maintenance projects in several cities. Good practice in protecting pedestrians in work zones is sporadic. Many cities, including high population centers, have no documented and comprehensive pedestrian safety standards for contractors to follow. Improvement of Part VI of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD) (FHWA, 1984), to include information on how to accommodate and protect pedestrians in work sites, has the greatest potential for promoting good practice. Ideas for such improvement are presented.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Practices in controlling and protecting pedestrians in work zones are investigated in this paper. The information presented is based on research conducted in the development of the report Zone Traffic Management Synthesis: Work Zone Pedestrian Protection (Report No. DTFH61-88-X-00007-3, FHWA, Dec. 1988). The findings and recommendations are based on interviews, literature review, and field observations of highway, building construction, and maintenance projects in several cities. Good practice in protecting pedestrians in work zones is sporadic. Many cities, including high population centers, have no documented and comprehensive pedestrian safety standards for contractors to follow. Improvement of Part VI of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD) (FHWA, 1984), to include information on how to accommodate and protect pedestrians in work sites, has the greatest potential for promoting good practice. Ideas for such improvement are presented.

Key concepts: Pedestrian, Work zone, Transport engineering, Work (physics), Occupational safety and health, Poison control, Highway maintenance, Best practice

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PRACTICES AND NEEDS IN WORK ZONE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY — Research Paper | ScholarLens