1984•Publication of: Colloquium Vervoersplanologisch SpeurwerkRequires access

URBAN TRANSPORT PLANNING; PARADOXES FOR THE 1980'S

Peter V. Hall

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Urban transport planning in advanced industrial countries faces a set of paradoxes. Since the late 1960s the emphasis has shifted from urban highway building to car restraint and public transport priority. But car ownership has continued to rise, fortified by the fact that real costs of driving have continued to decline after the momentary rise following the energy crises of 1973-4. At the same time, population and employment tends to leave central and inner cities which can support good levels of public transport, and to relocate in small towns and rural locations where this is almost impossible and where dependence on the car in consequence tends to be almost complete. The recent approach to transport planning stresses policies to meet the demands of individual household members constrained by time and space. This approach might in turn suggest fairly radical solutions to the problem of personal mobility, no longer based on the conventional public transport wisdom. (Author/TRRL)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Urban transport planning in advanced industrial countries faces a set of paradoxes. Since the late 1960s the emphasis has shifted from urban highway building to car restraint and public transport priority. But car ownership has continued to rise, fortified by the fact that real costs of driving have continued to decline after the momentary rise following the energy crises of 1973-4. At the same time, population and employment tends to leave central and inner cities which can support good levels of public transport, and to relocate in small towns and rural locations where this is almost impossible and where dependence on the car in consequence tends to be almost complete. The recent approach to transport planning stresses policies to meet the demands of individual household members constrained by time and space. This approach might in turn suggest fairly radical solutions to the problem of personal mobility, no longer based on the conventional public transport wisdom. (Author/TRRL)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Urban transport planning in advanced industrial countries faces a set of paradoxes. Since the late 1960s the emphasis has shifted from urban highway building to car restraint and public transport priority. But car ownership has continued to rise, fortified by the fact that real costs of driving have continued to decline after the momentary rise following the energy crises of 1973-4. At the same time, population and employment tends to leave central and inner cities which can support good levels of public transport, and to relocate in small towns and rural locations where this is almost impossible and where dependence on the car in consequence tends to be almost complete. The recent approach to transport planning stresses policies to meet the demands of individual household members constrained by time and space. This approach might in turn suggest fairly radical solutions to the problem of personal mobility, no longer based on the conventional public transport wisdom. (Author/TRRL)

Key concepts: Public transport, Car ownership, Private transport, Transportation planning, Population, Urban planning, Business, Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
URBAN TRANSPORT PLANNING; PARADOXES FOR THE 1980'S — Research Paper | ScholarLens