2014Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

Life-Cycle Design of Steel-Concrete Composite Bridges

Christian F Cremona, Binh T. Do, André Orcesi, Noel Robert, Nicolás Henry, Damien Champenoy

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The current practice of bridge design generally focuses on optimizing the economic and performance aspects of the bridge construction. Hence, it does not enable to fully optimize the operation and end-of-life strategies. In particular, maintenance strategies may be different from one design solution to another and one solution can appear to be more attractive at the design stage but less interesting when the entire life-cycle is considered, all the more, when user costs are also considered in the decision process. For these reasons, a global life-cycle approach is proposed in this paper to provide the bridge owner with a complete comparison within a set of design solutions from the construction to the end-of-life. It aims at combining economic, environmental and societal during their service lifetime. Several design alternatives for steel-concrete composite bridges are given for illustration. The different stages of the global life-cycle analysis are presented and major results and conclusions are given. A multi-criteria decision analysis is also presented to highlight the comparison between alternatives.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The current practice of bridge design generally focuses on optimizing the economic and performance aspects of the bridge construction. Hence, it does not enable to fully optimize the operation and end-of-life strategies. In particular, maintenance strategies may be different from one design solution to another and one solution can appear to be more attractive at the design stage but less interesting when the entire life-cycle is considered, all the more, when user costs are also considered in the decision process. For these reasons, a global life-cycle approach is proposed in this paper to provide the bridge owner with a complete comparison within a set of design solutions from the construction to the end-of-life. It aims at combining economic, environmental and societal during their service lifetime. Several design alternatives for steel-concrete composite bridges are given for illustration. The different stages of the global life-cycle analysis are presented and major results and conclusions are given. A multi-criteria decision analysis is also presented to highlight the comparison between alternatives.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The current practice of bridge design generally focuses on optimizing the economic and performance aspects of the bridge construction. Hence, it does not enable to fully optimize the operation and end-of-life strategies. In particular, maintenance strategies may be different from one design solution to another and one solution can appear to be more attractive at the design stage but less interesting when the entire life-cycle is considered, all the more, when user costs are also considered in the decision process. For these reasons, a global life-cycle approach is proposed in this paper to provide the bridge owner with a complete comparison within a set of design solutions from the construction to the end-of-life. It aims at combining economic, environmental and societal during their service lifetime. Several design alternatives for steel-concrete composite bridges are given for illustration. The different stages of the global life-cycle analysis are presented and major results and conclusions are given. A multi-criteria decision analysis is also presented to highlight the comparison between alternatives.

Key concepts: Bridge (graph theory), Service life, Set (abstract data type), Process (computing), Life-cycle cost analysis, Risk analysis (engineering), Engineering, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Life-Cycle Design of Steel-Concrete Composite Bridges — Research Paper | ScholarLens