1977Unpublished venueRequires access

COMPARABLE SALES ON TRIAL

Dave Lane

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This attempt to highlight some misconceptions of the legal profession regarding the appraisal process, discusses the courts definition of comparable sales, describes the concept of appraisal from the lawyers viewpoint, and points out aspects of the appraisal concept that are missed by the legal profession. The complexity of the appraisal process is noted, the importance of listing and offer data is indicated, and comments are made on the controversy over time factor and or the multiple use of data. It is noted that every sale, listing, option, and offering has some impact. Unless the market data are near-prefect for comparison purposes, direct comparison of each sale is not the way the appraiser uses the information. In the market data approach, value is best indicated by a careful analysis and backeting of a mass data into narrow confines; by means of various units of comparison, it usually can be demonstrated reasonably how they fit into the pattern, creating upper and lower limits of value within which the subject must logically fit.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This attempt to highlight some misconceptions of the legal profession regarding the appraisal process, discusses the courts definition of comparable sales, describes the concept of appraisal from the lawyers viewpoint, and points out aspects of the appraisal concept that are missed by the legal profession. The complexity of the appraisal process is noted, the importance of listing and offer data is indicated, and comments are made on the controversy over time factor and or the multiple use of data. It is noted that every sale, listing, option, and offering has some impact. Unless the market data are near-prefect for comparison purposes, direct comparison of each sale is not the way the appraiser uses the information. In the market data approach, value is best indicated by a careful analysis and backeting of a mass data into narrow confines; by means of various units of comparison, it usually can be demonstrated reasonably how they fit into the pattern, creating upper and lower limits of value within which the subject must logically fit.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This attempt to highlight some misconceptions of the legal profession regarding the appraisal process, discusses the courts definition of comparable sales, describes the concept of appraisal from the lawyers viewpoint, and points out aspects of the appraisal concept that are missed by the legal profession. The complexity of the appraisal process is noted, the importance of listing and offer data is indicated, and comments are made on the controversy over time factor and or the multiple use of data. It is noted that every sale, listing, option, and offering has some impact. Unless the market data are near-prefect for comparison purposes, direct comparison of each sale is not the way the appraiser uses the information. In the market data approach, value is best indicated by a careful analysis and backeting of a mass data into narrow confines; by means of various units of comparison, it usually can be demonstrated reasonably how they fit into the pattern, creating upper and lower limits of value within which the subject must logically fit.

Key concepts: Listing (finance), Value (mathematics), Subject (documents), Process (computing), Actuarial science, Business, Accounting, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARABLE SALES ON TRIAL — Research Paper | ScholarLens