COMPARABLE SALES ON TRIAL
Dave Lane
Abstract
Dave Lane
Abstract
This attempt to highlight some misconceptions of the legal profession regarding the appraisal process, discusses the courts definition of comparable sales, describes the concept of appraisal from the lawyers viewpoint, and points out aspects of the appraisal concept that are missed by the legal profession. The complexity of the appraisal process is noted, the importance of listing and offer data is indicated, and comments are made on the controversy over time factor and or the multiple use of data. It is noted that every sale, listing, option, and offering has some impact. Unless the market data are near-prefect for comparison purposes, direct comparison of each sale is not the way the appraiser uses the information. In the market data approach, value is best indicated by a careful analysis and backeting of a mass data into narrow confines; by means of various units of comparison, it usually can be demonstrated reasonably how they fit into the pattern, creating upper and lower limits of value within which the subject must logically fit.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This attempt to highlight some misconceptions of the legal profession regarding the appraisal process, discusses the courts definition of comparable sales, describes the concept of appraisal from the lawyers viewpoint, and points out aspects of the appraisal concept that are missed by the legal profession. The complexity of the appraisal process is noted, the importance of listing and offer data is indicated, and comments are made on the controversy over time factor and or the multiple use of data. It is noted that every sale, listing, option, and offering has some impact. Unless the market data are near-prefect for comparison purposes, direct comparison of each sale is not the way the appraiser uses the information. In the market data approach, value is best indicated by a careful analysis and backeting of a mass data into narrow confines; by means of various units of comparison, it usually can be demonstrated reasonably how they fit into the pattern, creating upper and lower limits of value within which the subject must logically fit.
Key concepts: Listing (finance), Value (mathematics), Subject (documents), Process (computing), Actuarial science, Business, Accounting, Economics