2006•Local transport todayRequires access

Road pricing: an economic 'no brainer' but the politics remain tricky

Alexis Morris

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A report by Sir Rod Eddington on the links between transport and economic productivity in the UK recommended the development of a national road pricing scheme, claiming it would be the most efficient mechanism for getting the maximum use from existing infrastructure. The study used the Department for Transport's national transport model to assess the effects of a national distance-based road pricing scheme in England that priced both congestion and environmental externalities. It suggested that, before considering the costs of setting up and running such a scheme, total benefits could be #28 billion a year in 2025. The level of congestion would fall by 50% although traffic levels would fall by only 7%. The report acknowledged that road pricing would present winners and losers, with car commuters being particularly badly affected. Eddington reported that road pricing could reduce the need to build additional road capacity. He suggests that the Government should take steps to making road pricing a reality.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A report by Sir Rod Eddington on the links between transport and economic productivity in the UK recommended the development of a national road pricing scheme, claiming it would be the most efficient mechanism for getting the maximum use from existing infrastructure. The study used the Department for Transport's national transport model to assess the effects of a national distance-based road pricing scheme in England that priced both congestion and environmental externalities. It suggested that, before considering the costs of setting up and running such a scheme, total benefits could be #28 billion a year in 2025. The level of congestion would fall by 50% although traffic levels would fall by only 7%. The report acknowledged that road pricing would present winners and losers, with car commuters being particularly badly affected. Eddington reported that road pricing could reduce the need to build additional road capacity. He suggests that the Government should take steps to making road pricing a reality.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A report by Sir Rod Eddington on the links between transport and economic productivity in the UK recommended the development of a national road pricing scheme, claiming it would be the most efficient mechanism for getting the maximum use from existing infrastructure. The study used the Department for Transport's national transport model to assess the effects of a national distance-based road pricing scheme in England that priced both congestion and environmental externalities. It suggested that, before considering the costs of setting up and running such a scheme, total benefits could be #28 billion a year in 2025. The level of congestion would fall by 50% although traffic levels would fall by only 7%. The report acknowledged that road pricing would present winners and losers, with car commuters being particularly badly affected. Eddington reported that road pricing could reduce the need to build additional road capacity. He suggests that the Government should take steps to making road pricing a reality.

Key concepts: Road pricing, Externality, Singapore Area Licensing Scheme, Congestion pricing, Traffic congestion, Government (linguistics), Transport engineering, Transport economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Road pricing: an economic 'no brainer' but the politics remain tricky — Research Paper | ScholarLens