2010Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)Open access

Consumer culture, branding and British adolescents : a vicious cycle? : a comparison between high and low-income adolescents

Katja Isaksen

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

This study examines the impact of consumerism and consumer culture on low-income British adolescents.Specifically, it investigates the effects of branding and advertising on the formation of self-concept clarity (SCC) and consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence (CSII).A comparative study was conducted between two groups; low and high income teenagers, assessing SCC and CSII by means of quantitative scales.It was found that low-income teenagers are less clear in their self-concept and are more susceptible to interpersonal influence than their high-income counterparts.A significant negative correlation between the two scales revealed that the less clear one's self-concept is, the more susceptible one is to interpersonal influence.It is proposed that an inability to 'keep up' with the latest fashion trends (due to restricted consumption opportunities) may result in a damaged self-concept amongst low-income teenagers, which leads to heightened susceptibility to consumption pressures and hence heightens the negative sociopsychological impacts of living in poverty.The results of the study are reviewed in terms of branding, advertising and consumer behavior and a proposed conceptual model of branding's impact on low-income teenagers is presented as a 'vicious cycle'.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study examines the impact of consumerism and consumer culture on low-income British adolescents.Specifically, it investigates the effects of branding and advertising on the formation of self-concept clarity (SCC) and consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence (CSII).A comparative study was conducted between two groups; low and high income teenagers, assessing SCC and CSII by means of quantitative scales.It was found that low-income teenagers are less clear in their self-concept and are more susceptible to interpersonal influence than their high-income counterparts.A significant negative correlation between the two scales revealed that the less clear one's self-concept is, the more susceptible one is to interpersonal influence.It is proposed that an inability to 'keep up' with the latest fashion trends (due to restricted consumption opportunities) may result in a damaged self-concept amongst low-income teenagers, which leads to heightened susceptibility to consumption pressures and hence heightens the negative sociopsychological impacts of living in poverty.The results of the study are reviewed in terms of branding, advertising and consumer behavior and a proposed conceptual model of branding's impact on low-income teenagers is presented as a 'vicious cycle'.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study examines the impact of consumerism and consumer culture on low-income British adolescents.Specifically, it investigates the effects of branding and advertising on the formation of self-concept clarity (SCC) and consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence (CSII).A comparative study was conducted between two groups; low and high income teenagers, assessing SCC and CSII by means of quantitative scales.It was found that low-income teenagers are less clear in their self-concept and are more susceptible to interpersonal influence than their high-income counterparts.A significant negative correlation between the two scales revealed that the less clear one's self-concept is, the more susceptible one is to interpersonal influence.It is proposed that an inability to 'keep up' with the latest fashion trends (due to restricted consumption opportunities) may result in a damaged self-concept amongst low-income teenagers, which leads to heightened susceptibility to consumption pressures and hence heightens the negative sociopsychological impacts of living in poverty.The results of the study are reviewed in terms of branding, advertising and consumer behavior and a proposed conceptual model of branding's impact on low-income teenagers is presented as a 'vicious cycle'.

Key concepts: Happiness, Consumption (sociology), Consumerism, Social psychology, Advertising, Personal development, Personal identity, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Consumer culture, branding and British adolescents : a vicious cycle? : a comparison between high and low-income adolescents — Research Paper | ScholarLens