Federal Injunctions and State Criminal Prosecutions: Vestiges of Our Federalism
Bruce E. Gaynor
Abstract
Open-access reader
Bruce E. Gaynor
Abstract
Open-access reader
Increasingly over the past decade, persons charged with violations of "unconstitutional" federal or state statutes have sought to obtain equitable relief in the federal courts. Most often, the relief sought has been in the form of an injunction restraining the government from prosecuting or threatening to prosecute under the allegedly invalid statute. Declaratory relief (that the statute is, in fact, unconstitutional) has often been sought as an additional or alternative remedy.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Increasingly over the past decade, persons charged with violations of "unconstitutional" federal or state statutes have sought to obtain equitable relief in the federal courts. Most often, the relief sought has been in the form of an injunction restraining the government from prosecuting or threatening to prosecute under the allegedly invalid statute. Declaratory relief (that the statute is, in fact, unconstitutional) has often been sought as an additional or alternative remedy.
Key concepts: Federalism, Political science, Law, State (computer science), Criminology, Sociology, Mathematics, Politics