1994Unpublished venueRequires access

Walter Taylor Bridge - deck replacement - a case study

R P Hoskin, P Knight

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The increasing deterioration of the 57 year old timber deck of the Walter Taylor Suspension Bridge was causing inconvenience to the public with a poor quality ride and frequent maintenance interruptions. Logistics of replacing the deck were paramount as the bridge provides a vital link across the river and a detour of up to fifteen kilometres was necessary with any bridge closure. A total road closure was considered the only practical method for the 1750 square metre deck replacement with lightweight precast concrete panels. Selection of a precast lightweight aggregate concrete deck was based on minimising weight and reducing construction time. An early completion bonus was used to encourage a reduced closure time and inconvenience to the public. In a fortnight the contractor had removed the timber deck; abrasive blast cleaned and painted the top surfaces of the steel stringers and cross girders; welded shear stud connectors; positioned, grouted and jointed precast panels; replaced wind anchors; installed expansion joints; painted both suspension towers; and undertook associated approach works. Asphalt sealing of the bridge and approaches along with other maintenance activities were undertaken to maximise the benefit of the bridge closure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The increasing deterioration of the 57 year old timber deck of the Walter Taylor Suspension Bridge was causing inconvenience to the public with a poor quality ride and frequent maintenance interruptions. Logistics of replacing the deck were paramount as the bridge provides a vital link across the river and a detour of up to fifteen kilometres was necessary with any bridge closure. A total road closure was considered the only practical method for the 1750 square metre deck replacement with lightweight precast concrete panels. Selection of a precast lightweight aggregate concrete deck was based on minimising weight and reducing construction time. An early completion bonus was used to encourage a reduced closure time and inconvenience to the public. In a fortnight the contractor had removed the timber deck; abrasive blast cleaned and painted the top surfaces of the steel stringers and cross girders; welded shear stud connectors; positioned, grouted and jointed precast panels; replaced wind anchors; installed expansion joints; painted both suspension towers; and undertook associated approach works. Asphalt sealing of the bridge and approaches along with other maintenance activities were undertaken to maximise the benefit of the bridge closure.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The increasing deterioration of the 57 year old timber deck of the Walter Taylor Suspension Bridge was causing inconvenience to the public with a poor quality ride and frequent maintenance interruptions. Logistics of replacing the deck were paramount as the bridge provides a vital link across the river and a detour of up to fifteen kilometres was necessary with any bridge closure. A total road closure was considered the only practical method for the 1750 square metre deck replacement with lightweight precast concrete panels. Selection of a precast lightweight aggregate concrete deck was based on minimising weight and reducing construction time. An early completion bonus was used to encourage a reduced closure time and inconvenience to the public. In a fortnight the contractor had removed the timber deck; abrasive blast cleaned and painted the top surfaces of the steel stringers and cross girders; welded shear stud connectors; positioned, grouted and jointed precast panels; replaced wind anchors; installed expansion joints; painted both suspension towers; and undertook associated approach works. Asphalt sealing of the bridge and approaches along with other maintenance activities were undertaken to maximise the benefit of the bridge closure.

Key concepts: Precast concrete, Deck, Engineering, Bridge (graph theory), Closure (psychology), Girder, Bridge deck, Structural engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Walter Taylor Bridge - deck replacement - a case study — Research Paper | ScholarLens