2008Unpublished venueRequires access

NATO: Relevant in the Twenty-First Century?

Preston Thompson

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In 1991, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) main adversary, the Soviet Union, ended the Cold War with the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact. To ensure their alliance's relevance, NATO members then re-evaluated NATO's strategic purpose, nature, and past Cold War responsibilities. Initially postured in Western Europe as collective defense against eastern aggression, NATO must once again review its longterm strategy. With no Cold War adversary and with the explosion of globalization, NATO has expanded its missions to meet global challenges; it now includes 26 member nations and is still growing. The alliance has restructured and accepted the challenge of transforming to meet future challenges. This research paper analyzes NATO's relevance in the 21st century security environment. It discusses the implications of recent NATO enlargement, reviews recent NATO transformation, and assesses the value of current NATO missions in Iraq, Darfur, Sudan, and Afghanistan.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1991, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) main adversary, the Soviet Union, ended the Cold War with the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact. To ensure their alliance's relevance, NATO members then re-evaluated NATO's strategic purpose, nature, and past Cold War responsibilities. Initially postured in Western Europe as collective defense against eastern aggression, NATO must once again review its longterm strategy. With no Cold War adversary and with the explosion of globalization, NATO has expanded its missions to meet global challenges; it now includes 26 member nations and is still growing. The alliance has restructured and accepted the challenge of transforming to meet future challenges. This research paper analyzes NATO's relevance in the 21st century security environment. It discusses the implications of recent NATO enlargement, reviews recent NATO transformation, and assesses the value of current NATO missions in Iraq, Darfur, Sudan, and Afghanistan.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1991, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) main adversary, the Soviet Union, ended the Cold War with the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact. To ensure their alliance's relevance, NATO members then re-evaluated NATO's strategic purpose, nature, and past Cold War responsibilities. Initially postured in Western Europe as collective defense against eastern aggression, NATO must once again review its longterm strategy. With no Cold War adversary and with the explosion of globalization, NATO has expanded its missions to meet global challenges; it now includes 26 member nations and is still growing. The alliance has restructured and accepted the challenge of transforming to meet future challenges. This research paper analyzes NATO's relevance in the 21st century security environment. It discusses the implications of recent NATO enlargement, reviews recent NATO transformation, and assesses the value of current NATO missions in Iraq, Darfur, Sudan, and Afghanistan.

Key concepts: Geography, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
NATO: Relevant in the Twenty-First Century? — Research Paper | ScholarLens