1973Unpublished venueRequires access

SURVEY ON SHOULDER DESIGN AND OPERATION PRACTICES

N J Rowan

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY OF THE DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS OF HIGHWAY SHOULDERS (QUESTIONS WERE DESIGNED TO OBTAIN COMPARABLE DATA ON SHOULDER DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS RELATING TO WARRANTS AND GUIDELINES, USE OF EDGELINES, SHOULDER WIDTHS, AND SRUCTURAL QUALITY OF SHOULDERS AS COMPARED WITH THAT OF MAIN LANES), REVEALED SEVERAL FACTORS CONCERNING DESIGN, CRITERIA AND OPERATION PRACTICES. THERE WAS GENERAL AGREEMENT ON THE NEED FOR GOOD SHOULDERS AND ON SHOULDER CRITERIA FOR THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM. THERE WAS DISSENT AND LACK OF CONSISTENCY IN OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON DESIGN CRITERIA, THE USE OF SHOULDER AREA TO FACILITATE PASSING MANEUVER, LATERAL PLACEMENT OF EDGELINES AND SHOULDER WIDTH. THE PAUCITY OF RESEARCH IN AREAS SUCH AS NATURAL CONTRAST, EDGELINE PLACEMENT, AND SHOULDER WIDTH IS NOTED, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF STANDARDS FOR SHOULDER DESIGN IS URGED.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY OF THE DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS OF HIGHWAY SHOULDERS (QUESTIONS WERE DESIGNED TO OBTAIN COMPARABLE DATA ON SHOULDER DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS RELATING TO WARRANTS AND GUIDELINES, USE OF EDGELINES, SHOULDER WIDTHS, AND SRUCTURAL QUALITY OF SHOULDERS AS COMPARED WITH THAT OF MAIN LANES), REVEALED SEVERAL FACTORS CONCERNING DESIGN, CRITERIA AND OPERATION PRACTICES. THERE WAS GENERAL AGREEMENT ON THE NEED FOR GOOD SHOULDERS AND ON SHOULDER CRITERIA FOR THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM. THERE WAS DISSENT AND LACK OF CONSISTENCY IN OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON DESIGN CRITERIA, THE USE OF SHOULDER AREA TO FACILITATE PASSING MANEUVER, LATERAL PLACEMENT OF EDGELINES AND SHOULDER WIDTH. THE PAUCITY OF RESEARCH IN AREAS SUCH AS NATURAL CONTRAST, EDGELINE PLACEMENT, AND SHOULDER WIDTH IS NOTED, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF STANDARDS FOR SHOULDER DESIGN IS URGED.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY OF THE DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS OF HIGHWAY SHOULDERS (QUESTIONS WERE DESIGNED TO OBTAIN COMPARABLE DATA ON SHOULDER DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS RELATING TO WARRANTS AND GUIDELINES, USE OF EDGELINES, SHOULDER WIDTHS, AND SRUCTURAL QUALITY OF SHOULDERS AS COMPARED WITH THAT OF MAIN LANES), REVEALED SEVERAL FACTORS CONCERNING DESIGN, CRITERIA AND OPERATION PRACTICES. THERE WAS GENERAL AGREEMENT ON THE NEED FOR GOOD SHOULDERS AND ON SHOULDER CRITERIA FOR THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM. THERE WAS DISSENT AND LACK OF CONSISTENCY IN OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON DESIGN CRITERIA, THE USE OF SHOULDER AREA TO FACILITATE PASSING MANEUVER, LATERAL PLACEMENT OF EDGELINES AND SHOULDER WIDTH. THE PAUCITY OF RESEARCH IN AREAS SUCH AS NATURAL CONTRAST, EDGELINE PLACEMENT, AND SHOULDER WIDTH IS NOTED, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF STANDARDS FOR SHOULDER DESIGN IS URGED.

Key concepts: Shoulders, Consistency (knowledge bases), Quality (philosophy), Engineering, Medicine, Computer science, Surgery, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SURVEY ON SHOULDER DESIGN AND OPERATION PRACTICES — Research Paper | ScholarLens