2007Transportation Research Board 86th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

Spatial Analysis of Freeway Incidents and Incident Detection

Khaled Hamad, Cesar A. Quiroga

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the spatial distribution of incidents and incident detection on a traffic management center’s instrumented network. The researchers evaluated the spatial distribution of incidents according to different categories including (a) temporal distribution of incidents by: month and season (academic year versus summer), day of week and weekday versus weekend day, and time of day (AM peak, midday, PM peak, and evening and early-morning hours); (b) traffic volume; and (c) corridors. To conduct this analysis, the researchers used archived ITS data, particularly freeway incident and incident alarm data, as well as a geodatabase of ITS features. In addition, the researchers used several GIS tools to perform the spatial queries needed for the analysis. A number of maps were developed to provide sector-by-sector performance measures such as incident rates and incident detection rates. This analysis helps optimize freeway incident management practices. For example, it can be used to identify freeway segments with higher-than-normal incident rates and to accordingly optimize service patrol schedules and routes. Although the analysis described in this paper used data from one jurisdiction (San Antonio, Texas), the methodology is sufficiently generic to enable implementation at other traffic management centers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents an analysis of the spatial distribution of incidents and incident detection on a traffic management center’s instrumented network. The researchers evaluated the spatial distribution of incidents according to different categories including (a) temporal distribution of incidents by: month and season (academic year versus summer), day of week and weekday versus weekend day, and time of day (AM peak, midday, PM peak, and evening and early-morning hours); (b) traffic volume; and (c) corridors. To conduct this analysis, the researchers used archived ITS data, particularly freeway incident and incident alarm data, as well as a geodatabase of ITS features. In addition, the researchers used several GIS tools to perform the spatial queries needed for the analysis. A number of maps were developed to provide sector-by-sector performance measures such as incident rates and incident detection rates. This analysis helps optimize freeway incident management practices. For example, it can be used to identify freeway segments with higher-than-normal incident rates and to accordingly optimize service patrol schedules and routes. Although the analysis described in this paper used data from one jurisdiction (San Antonio, Texas), the methodology is sufficiently generic to enable implementation at other traffic management centers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the spatial distribution of incidents and incident detection on a traffic management center’s instrumented network. The researchers evaluated the spatial distribution of incidents according to different categories including (a) temporal distribution of incidents by: month and season (academic year versus summer), day of week and weekday versus weekend day, and time of day (AM peak, midday, PM peak, and evening and early-morning hours); (b) traffic volume; and (c) corridors. To conduct this analysis, the researchers used archived ITS data, particularly freeway incident and incident alarm data, as well as a geodatabase of ITS features. In addition, the researchers used several GIS tools to perform the spatial queries needed for the analysis. A number of maps were developed to provide sector-by-sector performance measures such as incident rates and incident detection rates. This analysis helps optimize freeway incident management practices. For example, it can be used to identify freeway segments with higher-than-normal incident rates and to accordingly optimize service patrol schedules and routes. Although the analysis described in this paper used data from one jurisdiction (San Antonio, Texas), the methodology is sufficiently generic to enable implementation at other traffic management centers.

Key concepts: Incident management, Incident report, Transport engineering, Names of the days of the week, Computer science, Geography, Engineering, Computer security

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spatial Analysis of Freeway Incidents and Incident Detection — Research Paper | ScholarLens