2002˜The œAmerican city & countyRequires access

Congestion clears a path for commuter programs

Michael Fickes

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

U.S. commuters are facing increased traffic bottlenecks, placing growing pressure on transport agencies to provide transit alternatives and promote their use. In a recent study of 68 urban areas, the Texas Transportation Institute estimated that the cost of traffic congestion, as measured by lost time and wasted fuel, rose from $21 billion in 1982, to $78 billion in 1999. According to the FHWA, highway travel increased by 80% from 1980-2000, while the number of drivers increased by 30% during this period. At the same time, highway capacity grew by only 2%, the prime cause underlying the concurrent increase in traffic congestion. Without the possibility of a boom in highway capacity, local transport agencies must continue to address traffic congestion as a behavioral issue. This article focuses on efforts by several U.S. communities to employ a broad range of incentives to induce drivers to rely more on light rail/buses, carpools, bicycles, and walking to satisfy their urban transport and commuting needs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

U.S. commuters are facing increased traffic bottlenecks, placing growing pressure on transport agencies to provide transit alternatives and promote their use. In a recent study of 68 urban areas, the Texas Transportation Institute estimated that the cost of traffic congestion, as measured by lost time and wasted fuel, rose from $21 billion in 1982, to $78 billion in 1999. According to the FHWA, highway travel increased by 80% from 1980-2000, while the number of drivers increased by 30% during this period. At the same time, highway capacity grew by only 2%, the prime cause underlying the concurrent increase in traffic congestion. Without the possibility of a boom in highway capacity, local transport agencies must continue to address traffic congestion as a behavioral issue. This article focuses on efforts by several U.S. communities to employ a broad range of incentives to induce drivers to rely more on light rail/buses, carpools, bicycles, and walking to satisfy their urban transport and commuting needs.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

U.S. commuters are facing increased traffic bottlenecks, placing growing pressure on transport agencies to provide transit alternatives and promote their use. In a recent study of 68 urban areas, the Texas Transportation Institute estimated that the cost of traffic congestion, as measured by lost time and wasted fuel, rose from $21 billion in 1982, to $78 billion in 1999. According to the FHWA, highway travel increased by 80% from 1980-2000, while the number of drivers increased by 30% during this period. At the same time, highway capacity grew by only 2%, the prime cause underlying the concurrent increase in traffic congestion. Without the possibility of a boom in highway capacity, local transport agencies must continue to address traffic congestion as a behavioral issue. This article focuses on efforts by several U.S. communities to employ a broad range of incentives to induce drivers to rely more on light rail/buses, carpools, bicycles, and walking to satisfy their urban transport and commuting needs.

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Traffic congestion, Boom, Incentive, Vehicle miles of travel, Congestion pricing, Business, Transit (satellite)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Congestion clears a path for commuter programs — Research Paper | ScholarLens