2009Transportation Research Board 88th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

Comparative Life-Cycle Analysis of Brazilian Sugarcane Ethanol and North American Ethanol

Cristiano Façanha, Diane Simiu

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and net energy balance associated with ethanol produced from sugarcane in Brazil and corn and cellulosic ethanol from North America on a life-cycle basis. Because Brazilian ethanol would need to be imported, GHG emissions and energy associated with international logistics are taken into account. The conclusions from this analysis indicate that sugarcane ethanol is considerably better than corn ethanol even when considering the energy associated with importing ethanol from Brazil. Despite the many disparate conclusions amongst existing ethanol life-cycle studies, there seems to be a consensus that both cellulosic and sugarcane ethanol could provide substantial environmental benefits when compared to corn ethanol and gasoline. As the technology for the production of ethanol from cellulosic sources matures, more options will become available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study is to compare the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and net energy balance associated with ethanol produced from sugarcane in Brazil and corn and cellulosic ethanol from North America on a life-cycle basis. Because Brazilian ethanol would need to be imported, GHG emissions and energy associated with international logistics are taken into account. The conclusions from this analysis indicate that sugarcane ethanol is considerably better than corn ethanol even when considering the energy associated with importing ethanol from Brazil. Despite the many disparate conclusions amongst existing ethanol life-cycle studies, there seems to be a consensus that both cellulosic and sugarcane ethanol could provide substantial environmental benefits when compared to corn ethanol and gasoline. As the technology for the production of ethanol from cellulosic sources matures, more options will become available.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and net energy balance associated with ethanol produced from sugarcane in Brazil and corn and cellulosic ethanol from North America on a life-cycle basis. Because Brazilian ethanol would need to be imported, GHG emissions and energy associated with international logistics are taken into account. The conclusions from this analysis indicate that sugarcane ethanol is considerably better than corn ethanol even when considering the energy associated with importing ethanol from Brazil. Despite the many disparate conclusions amongst existing ethanol life-cycle studies, there seems to be a consensus that both cellulosic and sugarcane ethanol could provide substantial environmental benefits when compared to corn ethanol and gasoline. As the technology for the production of ethanol from cellulosic sources matures, more options will become available.

Key concepts: Cellulosic ethanol, Corn ethanol, Ethanol fuel, Gasoline, Greenhouse gas, Biofuel, Life-cycle assessment, Ethanol

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Life-Cycle Analysis of Brazilian Sugarcane Ethanol and North American Ethanol — Research Paper | ScholarLens