2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: Concepts and Contending Accounts

Fred Chernoff

Open publisher page 51 citations

Abstract

Introduction Three Policy Dilemmas: Iraq, North Korea, Russia and China Policy Decisions and Theories of International Relations International Relations and Scientific Criteria for Choosing a Theory Critical Theories and the Attack on the Scientific Study of International Relations Conclusion

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction Three Policy Dilemmas: Iraq, North Korea, Russia and China Policy Decisions and Theories of International Relations International Relations and Scientific Criteria for Choosing a Theory Critical Theories and the Attack on the Scientific Study of International Relations Conclusion

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction Three Policy Dilemmas: Iraq, North Korea, Russia and China Policy Decisions and Theories of International Relations International Relations and Scientific Criteria for Choosing a Theory Critical Theories and the Attack on the Scientific Study of International Relations Conclusion

Key concepts: Metatheory, International relations, International relations theory, China, Epistemology, Political science, International studies, Positive economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: Concepts and Contending Accounts — Research Paper | ScholarLens