1998•Unpublished venueRequires access

Business Object Facilities - A Comparative Analysis.

Wolfgang Emmerich, Ernst Ellmer, Birgit Osterholt, Roberto V. Zicari

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Rapidly changing business processes require quick adaption of supporting information systems. Component technologies in general and business objects, in particular seem a promising approach. In this paper, we survey, analyse and compare six business object approaches. We develop a comparison model covering concepts, distribution infrastructure, object facilities and object solutions. We then use the model to analyse the Combined Submission to the OMG Business Object Domain Task Force, the SSA Business Object Facility, Sun's Enterprise JavaBeans, IBM's San Francisco, Microsoft ActiveX and the SAP Business Framework. Each of the approaches is described in terms of the model, which allows us to compare them analytically. 1 Introduction Today's enterprises face highly competitive markets. They are forced to constantly adapt to new requirements, to revisit products, to change processes, to change suppliers and to establish new collaborations. Information systems supporting such ent...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rapidly changing business processes require quick adaption of supporting information systems. Component technologies in general and business objects, in particular seem a promising approach. In this paper, we survey, analyse and compare six business object approaches. We develop a comparison model covering concepts, distribution infrastructure, object facilities and object solutions. We then use the model to analyse the Combined Submission to the OMG Business Object Domain Task Force, the SSA Business Object Facility, Sun's Enterprise JavaBeans, IBM's San Francisco, Microsoft ActiveX and the SAP Business Framework. Each of the approaches is described in terms of the model, which allows us to compare them analytically. 1 Introduction Today's enterprises face highly competitive markets. They are forced to constantly adapt to new requirements, to revisit products, to change processes, to change suppliers and to establish new collaborations. Information systems supporting such ent...

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rapidly changing business processes require quick adaption of supporting information systems. Component technologies in general and business objects, in particular seem a promising approach. In this paper, we survey, analyse and compare six business object approaches. We develop a comparison model covering concepts, distribution infrastructure, object facilities and object solutions. We then use the model to analyse the Combined Submission to the OMG Business Object Domain Task Force, the SSA Business Object Facility, Sun's Enterprise JavaBeans, IBM's San Francisco, Microsoft ActiveX and the SAP Business Framework. Each of the approaches is described in terms of the model, which allows us to compare them analytically. 1 Introduction Today's enterprises face highly competitive markets. They are forced to constantly adapt to new requirements, to revisit products, to change processes, to change suppliers and to establish new collaborations. Information systems supporting such ent...

Key concepts: Business domain, Business object, Computer science, Object (grammar), Business process modeling, Component (thermodynamics), Business rule, IBM

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Business Object Facilities - A Comparative Analysis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens