Real choices/new voices: the case for proportional representation elections in the United States
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Author information unavailable
Abstract
This text argues that plurality rules are unfair, outmoded and undemocratic and that the US should adopt a different electoral system, proprotional representation, by which officials are elected in multimember districts according to the proportion of the vote won by their parties.
OpenAlex reports 75 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This text argues that plurality rules are unfair, outmoded and undemocratic and that the US should adopt a different electoral system, proprotional representation, by which officials are elected in multimember districts according to the proportion of the vote won by their parties.
Key concepts: Representation (politics), Proportional representation, Political science, History, Politics, Law, Democracy