Understanding public attitudes to road user safety
Charles Musselwhite, Erel Avineri, Yusak O. Susilo, Eamon P. Fulcher, Darren Bhattachary, Andrew Hunter, Richard Stockley
Abstract
Charles Musselwhite, Erel Avineri, Yusak O. Susilo, Eamon P. Fulcher, Darren Bhattachary, Andrew Hunter, Richard Stockley
Abstract
This report provides the Department for Transport (DfT) with an in-depth understanding of how the public engage with the issue of road user safety. The research used qualitative methods and brought together the views of a wide range of adult road users. Specifically, a deliberative approach was used to explore the public's insights, perceptions and conceptualisation of road user safety and to go beyond their top of mind responses. A total of 240 participants were recruited in 4 areas across the UK (United Kingdom - Bradford, Glasgow, London, north-west Wales). In total, each area had six groups of ten participants. Group composition was based on a life-stage and attitude to road user risk.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This report provides the Department for Transport (DfT) with an in-depth understanding of how the public engage with the issue of road user safety. The research used qualitative methods and brought together the views of a wide range of adult road users. Specifically, a deliberative approach was used to explore the public's insights, perceptions and conceptualisation of road user safety and to go beyond their top of mind responses. A total of 240 participants were recruited in 4 areas across the UK (United Kingdom - Bradford, Glasgow, London, north-west Wales). In total, each area had six groups of ten participants. Group composition was based on a life-stage and attitude to road user risk.
Key concepts: Perception, Qualitative research, Applied psychology, Geography, Public relations, Psychology, Sociology, Political science