2005HPC Bridge ViewsRequires access

HPC Implementation Status

Louis N Triandafilou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper describes how, since the initiation of the AASHTO/SHRP Lead States Team concept for high performance concrete (HPC) over 10 years ago, there has been an aggressive effort by the concrete industry, State DOTs, and the FHWA to achieve nationwide implementation of HPC on bridge projects. Outstanding progress has been made in response to the FHWA Executive Director's 1997 challenge to construct at least one HPC bridge in every state by 2002. HPC Bridge Views has reported on many of these projects as well as the efforts of the FHWA’s HPC Technology Delivery Team to keep HPC in the forefront. Recently, the Team conducted a 14- question national survey to track this progress and other related concrete issues. On a preliminary basis, the map indicates which states have included HPC in bridge specifications in the last 10 years. Thirty-seven respondents selected HPC for low permeability, 30 for high strength, and 26 for both performance criteria. As background on why HPC was being used, respondents ranked deck cracking at ages less than 5 years as the most common distress, followed by corrosion of reinforcing steel, cracking of girders and substructure elements, and freeze-thaw damage.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper describes how, since the initiation of the AASHTO/SHRP Lead States Team concept for high performance concrete (HPC) over 10 years ago, there has been an aggressive effort by the concrete industry, State DOTs, and the FHWA to achieve nationwide implementation of HPC on bridge projects. Outstanding progress has been made in response to the FHWA Executive Director's 1997 challenge to construct at least one HPC bridge in every state by 2002. HPC Bridge Views has reported on many of these projects as well as the efforts of the FHWA’s HPC Technology Delivery Team to keep HPC in the forefront. Recently, the Team conducted a 14- question national survey to track this progress and other related concrete issues. On a preliminary basis, the map indicates which states have included HPC in bridge specifications in the last 10 years. Thirty-seven respondents selected HPC for low permeability, 30 for high strength, and 26 for both performance criteria. As background on why HPC was being used, respondents ranked deck cracking at ages less than 5 years as the most common distress, followed by corrosion of reinforcing steel, cracking of girders and substructure elements, and freeze-thaw damage.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper describes how, since the initiation of the AASHTO/SHRP Lead States Team concept for high performance concrete (HPC) over 10 years ago, there has been an aggressive effort by the concrete industry, State DOTs, and the FHWA to achieve nationwide implementation of HPC on bridge projects. Outstanding progress has been made in response to the FHWA Executive Director's 1997 challenge to construct at least one HPC bridge in every state by 2002. HPC Bridge Views has reported on many of these projects as well as the efforts of the FHWA’s HPC Technology Delivery Team to keep HPC in the forefront. Recently, the Team conducted a 14- question national survey to track this progress and other related concrete issues. On a preliminary basis, the map indicates which states have included HPC in bridge specifications in the last 10 years. Thirty-seven respondents selected HPC for low permeability, 30 for high strength, and 26 for both performance criteria. As background on why HPC was being used, respondents ranked deck cracking at ages less than 5 years as the most common distress, followed by corrosion of reinforcing steel, cracking of girders and substructure elements, and freeze-thaw damage.

Key concepts: Engineering, Bridge (graph theory), Forensic engineering, Supercomputer, Civil engineering, Construction engineering, Computer science, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
HPC Implementation Status — Research Paper | ScholarLens