2001•Unpublished venueRequires access

TEST FRAMEWORK AND PROPOSALS FOR THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE CAR REAR LIGHT CONFIGURATION

C C Schoon, R Roszbach

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In this report, the magnitude of the problem of rear-end collisions is described. The report also draws up a test framework based on a theoretical approach and a judgement of various recent provisions for improving the rear light configuration. These provisions include: regulation of light intensity; rear fog lights; braking-dependant lights; early-warning brake lights; lights activated by emergency stopping; and solutions reducing the wearing out of lamps. The test framework makes it possible to judge inventions on their necessity, functioning, and optical features. Adjustments to the rear light configuration during the last decennia involved addition of a component (third brake light, rear fog light). In this, existing functions were improved so that a gradual introduction could be applied (only new cars). As an adjustment often has consequences for the whole rear light configuration, it is concluded that 'Europe' was justly reserved. Once good arguments for introducing a new function or component (necessitating ) are presented, the complete renewal of the rear light configuration can be considered. Matters such as integration, standardisation, and adaptive regulation then become relevant. Recommendations are made for further adjustments to the rear light configuration. These adjustments are also aimed at improving the present functions, so that retrofit is unnecessary. These are: making two rear fog lights mandatory; voluntary regulation of light intensity; voluntary alarm lights for emergency stops; and voluntary alarm lights after an emergency stop.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this report, the magnitude of the problem of rear-end collisions is described. The report also draws up a test framework based on a theoretical approach and a judgement of various recent provisions for improving the rear light configuration. These provisions include: regulation of light intensity; rear fog lights; braking-dependant lights; early-warning brake lights; lights activated by emergency stopping; and solutions reducing the wearing out of lamps. The test framework makes it possible to judge inventions on their necessity, functioning, and optical features. Adjustments to the rear light configuration during the last decennia involved addition of a component (third brake light, rear fog light). In this, existing functions were improved so that a gradual introduction could be applied (only new cars). As an adjustment often has consequences for the whole rear light configuration, it is concluded that 'Europe' was justly reserved. Once good arguments for introducing a new function or component (necessitating ) are presented, the complete renewal of the rear light configuration can be considered. Matters such as integration, standardisation, and adaptive regulation then become relevant. Recommendations are made for further adjustments to the rear light configuration. These adjustments are also aimed at improving the present functions, so that retrofit is unnecessary. These are: making two rear fog lights mandatory; voluntary regulation of light intensity; voluntary alarm lights for emergency stops; and voluntary alarm lights after an emergency stop.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this report, the magnitude of the problem of rear-end collisions is described. The report also draws up a test framework based on a theoretical approach and a judgement of various recent provisions for improving the rear light configuration. These provisions include: regulation of light intensity; rear fog lights; braking-dependant lights; early-warning brake lights; lights activated by emergency stopping; and solutions reducing the wearing out of lamps. The test framework makes it possible to judge inventions on their necessity, functioning, and optical features. Adjustments to the rear light configuration during the last decennia involved addition of a component (third brake light, rear fog light). In this, existing functions were improved so that a gradual introduction could be applied (only new cars). As an adjustment often has consequences for the whole rear light configuration, it is concluded that 'Europe' was justly reserved. Once good arguments for introducing a new function or component (necessitating ) are presented, the complete renewal of the rear light configuration can be considered. Matters such as integration, standardisation, and adaptive regulation then become relevant. Recommendations are made for further adjustments to the rear light configuration. These adjustments are also aimed at improving the present functions, so that retrofit is unnecessary. These are: making two rear fog lights mandatory; voluntary regulation of light intensity; voluntary alarm lights for emergency stops; and voluntary alarm lights after an emergency stop.

Key concepts: Component (thermodynamics), Brake, Light intensity, Computer science, ALARM, Automotive engineering, Engineering, Optics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TEST FRAMEWORK AND PROPOSALS FOR THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE CAR REAR LIGHT CONFIGURATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens