2006Journal of Air Law and CommerceOpen access

The General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994 - An Update

Orla M Brady

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

T HE GENERAL AVIATION Revitalization Act ("GARA") stat- ute, and its judicial interpretation, generates many fans and foes.One can find ample arguments on either side of the fence for support or criticism on the issue of GARA.Like any good political argument, there are statistics, figures, and public policy debates that support both sides.'Tort reform is a hot issue but, GARA is unique.GARA has been called "the envy of every manufacturing industry with ongoing product liability exposure" because there are no other manufacturing statutes like it 2 GARA is a young statute and its continued development through emergent interpretation will be an interesting ride.In this review, I will focus on some provisions and exceptions to the GARA stat-* This article was written before the decision in Sheesle, v. Cessna Aircraft Co., which is a pivotal GARA case.Please see Sheesiry v. Cessna Aircraft Co., No. Civ.02-4185-KES, 2006 WI. 1084103 (D.S.D. Apr. 20, 2006).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

T HE GENERAL AVIATION Revitalization Act ("GARA") stat- ute, and its judicial interpretation, generates many fans and foes.One can find ample arguments on either side of the fence for support or criticism on the issue of GARA.Like any good political argument, there are statistics, figures, and public policy debates that support both sides.'Tort reform is a hot issue but, GARA is unique.GARA has been called "the envy of every manufacturing industry with ongoing product liability exposure" because there are no other manufacturing statutes like it 2 GARA is a young statute and its continued development through emergent interpretation will be an interesting ride.In this review, I will focus on some provisions and exceptions to the GARA stat-* This article was written before the decision in Sheesle, v. Cessna Aircraft Co., which is a pivotal GARA case.Please see Sheesiry v. Cessna Aircraft Co., No. Civ.02-4185-KES, 2006 WI. 1084103 (D.S.D. Apr. 20, 2006).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

T HE GENERAL AVIATION Revitalization Act ("GARA") stat- ute, and its judicial interpretation, generates many fans and foes.One can find ample arguments on either side of the fence for support or criticism on the issue of GARA.Like any good political argument, there are statistics, figures, and public policy debates that support both sides.'Tort reform is a hot issue but, GARA is unique.GARA has been called "the envy of every manufacturing industry with ongoing product liability exposure" because there are no other manufacturing statutes like it 2 GARA is a young statute and its continued development through emergent interpretation will be an interesting ride.In this review, I will focus on some provisions and exceptions to the GARA stat-* This article was written before the decision in Sheesle, v. Cessna Aircraft Co., which is a pivotal GARA case.Please see Sheesiry v. Cessna Aircraft Co., No. Civ.02-4185-KES, 2006 WI. 1084103 (D.S.D. Apr. 20, 2006).

Key concepts: Aeronautics, Aviation, Aviation law, General aviation, Engineering, Transport engineering, Business, Civil aviation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994 - An Update — Research Paper | ScholarLens