1986•Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) Conference, 13th, 1986, Adelaide, AustraliaRequires access

Some further observations on accident severity and casualty class

D C Andreassen

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

For assessing the worth of accident countermeasures the all accident type average cost has no application as the aggregated number of accidents has no application in the evaluation of countermeasures. The unit costs per person and per vehicle should be applied to the distribution of casualty classes for particular accident types. This paper examines the outcomes (ie, the distribution of casualty classes of the persons involved) of selected accident types across an eight year period to ascertain if the outcomes were consistent. The distribution of persons per accident by casualty class for the accident types was found to be consistent for each type and thus a typical outcome established for each. Updated unit costs can now be applied to these reference outcomes to establish the cost of particular accident types in any future year. The use of reported property damage accidents appears to improve the consistency of the data (a).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For assessing the worth of accident countermeasures the all accident type average cost has no application as the aggregated number of accidents has no application in the evaluation of countermeasures. The unit costs per person and per vehicle should be applied to the distribution of casualty classes for particular accident types. This paper examines the outcomes (ie, the distribution of casualty classes of the persons involved) of selected accident types across an eight year period to ascertain if the outcomes were consistent. The distribution of persons per accident by casualty class for the accident types was found to be consistent for each type and thus a typical outcome established for each. Updated unit costs can now be applied to these reference outcomes to establish the cost of particular accident types in any future year. The use of reported property damage accidents appears to improve the consistency of the data (a).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For assessing the worth of accident countermeasures the all accident type average cost has no application as the aggregated number of accidents has no application in the evaluation of countermeasures. The unit costs per person and per vehicle should be applied to the distribution of casualty classes for particular accident types. This paper examines the outcomes (ie, the distribution of casualty classes of the persons involved) of selected accident types across an eight year period to ascertain if the outcomes were consistent. The distribution of persons per accident by casualty class for the accident types was found to be consistent for each type and thus a typical outcome established for each. Updated unit costs can now be applied to these reference outcomes to establish the cost of particular accident types in any future year. The use of reported property damage accidents appears to improve the consistency of the data (a).

Key concepts: Accident (philosophy), Consistency (knowledge bases), Unit (ring theory), Class (philosophy), Forensic engineering, Computer science, Engineering, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Some further observations on accident severity and casualty class — Research Paper | ScholarLens