2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Ameliorating motorcyclist injury risk from flexible barrier collisions in Victoria

Nirmalene Lucinda Candappa, Christine Mulvihill, Bruce Corben, Michael G. Lenné

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Run-off-road crashes are a major cause of death and serious injury on Australia's roads. Typically involving roadside objects, such crashes account for over half of all fatalities in regional Victoria. While conventional barriers, such as concrete barriers and steel guardrails, have had only limited success in addressing run-off-road crashes, more recently, flexible barriers used over long lengths of roadway have shown great potential, especially in high-speed settings. European and Victorian experience indicate reductions of up to ninety per cent in serious and fatal injury run-off-road crashes. Flexible barriers deform and re-direct errant vehicles by absorbing a substantial proportion of the kinetic energy at impact, thereby frequently avoiding the severe outcomes generally associated with rollovers or crashes into rigid objects. However, there have been concerns that these barriers pose considerable injury risk to motorcyclists who strike them. In order to address these concerns, while still obtaining the safety benefits for the vast majority of road users, a number of barrier devices with the potential to ameliorate rider injury risk have become available. This paper reviews the main options available and identifies those that may be suitable for trial on Australasian roads.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Run-off-road crashes are a major cause of death and serious injury on Australia's roads. Typically involving roadside objects, such crashes account for over half of all fatalities in regional Victoria. While conventional barriers, such as concrete barriers and steel guardrails, have had only limited success in addressing run-off-road crashes, more recently, flexible barriers used over long lengths of roadway have shown great potential, especially in high-speed settings. European and Victorian experience indicate reductions of up to ninety per cent in serious and fatal injury run-off-road crashes. Flexible barriers deform and re-direct errant vehicles by absorbing a substantial proportion of the kinetic energy at impact, thereby frequently avoiding the severe outcomes generally associated with rollovers or crashes into rigid objects. However, there have been concerns that these barriers pose considerable injury risk to motorcyclists who strike them. In order to address these concerns, while still obtaining the safety benefits for the vast majority of road users, a number of barrier devices with the potential to ameliorate rider injury risk have become available. This paper reviews the main options available and identifies those that may be suitable for trial on Australasian roads.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Run-off-road crashes are a major cause of death and serious injury on Australia's roads. Typically involving roadside objects, such crashes account for over half of all fatalities in regional Victoria. While conventional barriers, such as concrete barriers and steel guardrails, have had only limited success in addressing run-off-road crashes, more recently, flexible barriers used over long lengths of roadway have shown great potential, especially in high-speed settings. European and Victorian experience indicate reductions of up to ninety per cent in serious and fatal injury run-off-road crashes. Flexible barriers deform and re-direct errant vehicles by absorbing a substantial proportion of the kinetic energy at impact, thereby frequently avoiding the severe outcomes generally associated with rollovers or crashes into rigid objects. However, there have been concerns that these barriers pose considerable injury risk to motorcyclists who strike them. In order to address these concerns, while still obtaining the safety benefits for the vast majority of road users, a number of barrier devices with the potential to ameliorate rider injury risk have become available. This paper reviews the main options available and identifies those that may be suitable for trial on Australasian roads.

Key concepts: Poison control, Injury prevention, Forensic engineering, Occupational safety and health, Transport engineering, Human factors and ergonomics, Suicide prevention, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ameliorating motorcyclist injury risk from flexible barrier collisions in Victoria — Research Paper | ScholarLens