Comparing Wet and Dry Distillers Grains Plus Solublesfor Yearling Finishing Cattle
Brandon L. Nuttelman, Dirk B. Burken, Cody Schneider, Galen E. Erickson, Terry J. Klopfenstein
Abstract
Open-access reader
Brandon L. Nuttelman, Dirk B. Burken, Cody Schneider, Galen E. Erickson, Terry J. Klopfenstein
Abstract
Open-access reader
Long yearling steers were used to compare wet distillers grains plus solubles(WDGS) and dried distillers grains plus solubles (DDGS) to a corn control (CON) when included at 35% of diet DM in finishing diets. Final BW was heavier (P = 0.03) for WDGS and DDGS as a result of increased (P < 0.01) ADG. Intakes were not different (P = 0.33) among treatments. Cattle fed WDGS were most efficient, DDGS intermediate, and CON the least efficient. The feeding values were 31.3 and 21.5% greater for WDGS and DDGS than corn, respectively.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Long yearling steers were used to compare wet distillers grains plus solubles(WDGS) and dried distillers grains plus solubles (DDGS) to a corn control (CON) when included at 35% of diet DM in finishing diets. Final BW was heavier (P = 0.03) for WDGS and DDGS as a result of increased (P < 0.01) ADG. Intakes were not different (P = 0.33) among treatments. Cattle fed WDGS were most efficient, DDGS intermediate, and CON the least efficient. The feeding values were 31.3 and 21.5% greater for WDGS and DDGS than corn, respectively.
Key concepts: Distillers grains, Animal science, Food science, Beef cattle, Chemistry, Biology