1996•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns

Kim Fridkin Kahn

Open publisher page 412 citations

Abstract

In America today, women hold only 6% of U.S. senate seats and state governorships. What accounts for women's lack of success in winning statewide office? When might a campaign slogan like "a mom in tennis shoes" meet with victory, and when might it fail? Does a woman who speaks intelligently and forcefully about nuclear proliferation in the Middle East stand a chance of winning a major political race? Drawing on a wide sample of campaign advertisements, mass media coverage, voter surveys, and election results, Kim Kahn investigated the reasons why women are so poorly represented in the highest strata of political power in America. Focusing on the cycle of influence among campaign tactics, media representation, and voter opinion in senate and gubernatorial races, The Political Consequences of Being a Woman explores how women's perceived liabilities and capabilities make or, more often, break their campaigns

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In America today, women hold only 6% of U.S. senate seats and state governorships. What accounts for women's lack of success in winning statewide office? When might a campaign slogan like "a mom in tennis shoes" meet with victory, and when might it fail? Does a woman who speaks intelligently and forcefully about nuclear proliferation in the Middle East stand a chance of winning a major political race? Drawing on a wide sample of campaign advertisements, mass media coverage, voter surveys, and election results, Kim Kahn investigated the reasons why women are so poorly represented in the highest strata of political power in America. Focusing on the cycle of influence among campaign tactics, media representation, and voter opinion in senate and gubernatorial races, The Political Consequences of Being a Woman explores how women's perceived liabilities and capabilities make or, more often, break their campaigns

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 412 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In America today, women hold only 6% of U.S. senate seats and state governorships. What accounts for women's lack of success in winning statewide office? When might a campaign slogan like "a mom in tennis shoes" meet with victory, and when might it fail? Does a woman who speaks intelligently and forcefully about nuclear proliferation in the Middle East stand a chance of winning a major political race? Drawing on a wide sample of campaign advertisements, mass media coverage, voter surveys, and election results, Kim Kahn investigated the reasons why women are so poorly represented in the highest strata of political power in America. Focusing on the cycle of influence among campaign tactics, media representation, and voter opinion in senate and gubernatorial races, The Political Consequences of Being a Woman explores how women's perceived liabilities and capabilities make or, more often, break their campaigns

Key concepts: Politics, Political science, Media coverage, Social psychology, Gender studies, Psychology, Sociology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns — Research Paper | ScholarLens