1990•OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Options for compliance with acid rain legislation

S.M. Katzberger, D.G. Sloat, Chicago Lundy

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Acid rain control legislation as a part of the Clean Air Act amendments of 1989 will require reduction of utility sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}) emissions by 10 million tons* annually in two phases over a 10-year period. Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO{sub x}) will also be reduced by 2 to 2.5 million tons per year. Available options for achieving compliance include fuel switching, fuel blending, and a wide variety of retrofit technologies. This paper describes the House and Senate versions of the acid rain legislation and presents the available options for compliance. Technologies considered include slagging combustors, furnace sorbent injection, duct sorbent injection, repowering technologies, low-NO{sub x} burners, reburning, selective catalytic reduction, selective noncatalytic reduction, and wet and dry flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems. The relative costs, SO{sub 2} or NO{sub x} reduction capabilities, and site impacts of each compliance option are also described.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Acid rain control legislation as a part of the Clean Air Act amendments of 1989 will require reduction of utility sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}) emissions by 10 million tons* annually in two phases over a 10-year period. Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO{sub x}) will also be reduced by 2 to 2.5 million tons per year. Available options for achieving compliance include fuel switching, fuel blending, and a wide variety of retrofit technologies. This paper describes the House and Senate versions of the acid rain legislation and presents the available options for compliance. Technologies considered include slagging combustors, furnace sorbent injection, duct sorbent injection, repowering technologies, low-NO{sub x} burners, reburning, selective catalytic reduction, selective noncatalytic reduction, and wet and dry flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems. The relative costs, SO{sub 2} or NO{sub x} reduction capabilities, and site impacts of each compliance option are also described.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Acid rain control legislation as a part of the Clean Air Act amendments of 1989 will require reduction of utility sulfur dioxide (SO{sub 2}) emissions by 10 million tons* annually in two phases over a 10-year period. Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO{sub x}) will also be reduced by 2 to 2.5 million tons per year. Available options for achieving compliance include fuel switching, fuel blending, and a wide variety of retrofit technologies. This paper describes the House and Senate versions of the acid rain legislation and presents the available options for compliance. Technologies considered include slagging combustors, furnace sorbent injection, duct sorbent injection, repowering technologies, low-NO{sub x} burners, reburning, selective catalytic reduction, selective noncatalytic reduction, and wet and dry flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems. The relative costs, SO{sub 2} or NO{sub x} reduction capabilities, and site impacts of each compliance option are also described.

Key concepts: Sulfur dioxide, Waste management, Acid rain, Clean Air Act, Flue-gas desulfurization, Legislation, Environmental science, Flue gas

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Options for compliance with acid rain legislation — Research Paper | ScholarLens