On the existence of sharecropping
Daniel Ruiz Pérez, Kaniṣka Dam
Abstract
Daniel Ruiz Pérez, Kaniṣka Dam
Abstract
When tenancy contracts are subject to ex-post limited liability, it is optimal for the landlord to offer the tenant the entire crop share since full incentive leads to higher production even in the bad state of the nature, which can be appropriated in the form of fixed rental payments. We show, in a simple model of incentive contracts where the tenant carries out multiple tasks, that effort substitution effect helps explain share tenancy even if there is limited liability in the ex-post sense.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
When tenancy contracts are subject to ex-post limited liability, it is optimal for the landlord to offer the tenant the entire crop share since full incentive leads to higher production even in the bad state of the nature, which can be appropriated in the form of fixed rental payments. We show, in a simple model of incentive contracts where the tenant carries out multiple tasks, that effort substitution effect helps explain share tenancy even if there is limited liability in the ex-post sense.
Key concepts: Sharecropping, Leasehold estate, Landlord, Incentive, Renting, Payment, Limited liability, Microeconomics