1999OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Open access

A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF MAJOR BUS PRIORITY SCHEMES IN GREAT BRITAIN

G G Daugherty

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

The Transport Research Laboratory was commissioned to undertake research on two major bus priority schemes in Aberdeen and Brighton, and compare these findings with those of other schemes in the UK. Bus journey times generally improved within the bus lanes, but many of the schemes did not realise their full potential. One reason for this, is that vehicles approaching the bus lane sometimes experienced increased delays, caused by queues building up either alongside the bus lane (to a point where they extend upstream of the bus lane) or becasue the bus lane acts as a bottle-neck, throttling the flow of traffic. Another reason is that traffic tends to divert from priority routes if drivers perceive that their journey may be delayed along sections of the priority route. Diverted traffic entering further along the priority route can increase congeston at intersecting junctions, thereby delaying traffic on the priority route. Bus priority schemes alone do not seem to loosen peoples attachment to the car. Park and Ride (P&R) schemes have perhaps more success, but certainly not enough to reduce road congestion. Suggestions are given on how to improve the operation of major bus priority schemes. The lessons learnt from the case studies should enable the design and implementation of more effective schemes in the future. (A)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Transport Research Laboratory was commissioned to undertake research on two major bus priority schemes in Aberdeen and Brighton, and compare these findings with those of other schemes in the UK. Bus journey times generally improved within the bus lanes, but many of the schemes did not realise their full potential. One reason for this, is that vehicles approaching the bus lane sometimes experienced increased delays, caused by queues building up either alongside the bus lane (to a point where they extend upstream of the bus lane) or becasue the bus lane acts as a bottle-neck, throttling the flow of traffic. Another reason is that traffic tends to divert from priority routes if drivers perceive that their journey may be delayed along sections of the priority route. Diverted traffic entering further along the priority route can increase congeston at intersecting junctions, thereby delaying traffic on the priority route. Bus priority schemes alone do not seem to loosen peoples attachment to the car. Park and Ride (P&R) schemes have perhaps more success, but certainly not enough to reduce road congestion. Suggestions are given on how to improve the operation of major bus priority schemes. The lessons learnt from the case studies should enable the design and implementation of more effective schemes in the future. (A)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Transport Research Laboratory was commissioned to undertake research on two major bus priority schemes in Aberdeen and Brighton, and compare these findings with those of other schemes in the UK. Bus journey times generally improved within the bus lanes, but many of the schemes did not realise their full potential. One reason for this, is that vehicles approaching the bus lane sometimes experienced increased delays, caused by queues building up either alongside the bus lane (to a point where they extend upstream of the bus lane) or becasue the bus lane acts as a bottle-neck, throttling the flow of traffic. Another reason is that traffic tends to divert from priority routes if drivers perceive that their journey may be delayed along sections of the priority route. Diverted traffic entering further along the priority route can increase congeston at intersecting junctions, thereby delaying traffic on the priority route. Bus priority schemes alone do not seem to loosen peoples attachment to the car. Park and Ride (P&R) schemes have perhaps more success, but certainly not enough to reduce road congestion. Suggestions are given on how to improve the operation of major bus priority schemes. The lessons learnt from the case studies should enable the design and implementation of more effective schemes in the future. (A)

Key concepts: Bus priority, Transport engineering, Priority queue, Computer science, Queue, Traffic congestion, Point (geometry), Upstream (networking)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF MAJOR BUS PRIORITY SCHEMES IN GREAT BRITAIN — Research Paper | ScholarLens