1999Unpublished venueRequires access

REVIEW OF CLASS-E CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS IN SOUTH CAROLINA

Michael F. Petrou, Kent A. Harries

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In an effort to determine likely causes of cracking experienced in new Class E high performance concrete bridge decks, sight inspections of nine bridges in the Spartanburg, South Carolina area were conducted and a thorough review of construction documentation from three of these sights was carried out. Additionally, a review of the South Carolina State University (SCSU)/South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) report A Study of Microsilica Concrete, from which Class E concrete specifications were derived, and of SCDOT Concrete Specifications was conducted. Finally, a review of bridge deck cracking phenomena and alternative bridge deck designs was carried out. It is concluded that observed cracking has two likely causes. Early-age shrinkage cracking resulted from poor curing practices. Load induced cracking, appearing shortly after the spans were open to traffic may result from the relatively stiff decks being placed on more flexible bridge superstructures. Recommendations regarding concrete mix design, application of design parameters and on site quality control are presented. Alternative high performance bridge deck schemes are reviewed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In an effort to determine likely causes of cracking experienced in new Class E high performance concrete bridge decks, sight inspections of nine bridges in the Spartanburg, South Carolina area were conducted and a thorough review of construction documentation from three of these sights was carried out. Additionally, a review of the South Carolina State University (SCSU)/South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) report A Study of Microsilica Concrete, from which Class E concrete specifications were derived, and of SCDOT Concrete Specifications was conducted. Finally, a review of bridge deck cracking phenomena and alternative bridge deck designs was carried out. It is concluded that observed cracking has two likely causes. Early-age shrinkage cracking resulted from poor curing practices. Load induced cracking, appearing shortly after the spans were open to traffic may result from the relatively stiff decks being placed on more flexible bridge superstructures. Recommendations regarding concrete mix design, application of design parameters and on site quality control are presented. Alternative high performance bridge deck schemes are reviewed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In an effort to determine likely causes of cracking experienced in new Class E high performance concrete bridge decks, sight inspections of nine bridges in the Spartanburg, South Carolina area were conducted and a thorough review of construction documentation from three of these sights was carried out. Additionally, a review of the South Carolina State University (SCSU)/South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) report A Study of Microsilica Concrete, from which Class E concrete specifications were derived, and of SCDOT Concrete Specifications was conducted. Finally, a review of bridge deck cracking phenomena and alternative bridge deck designs was carried out. It is concluded that observed cracking has two likely causes. Early-age shrinkage cracking resulted from poor curing practices. Load induced cracking, appearing shortly after the spans were open to traffic may result from the relatively stiff decks being placed on more flexible bridge superstructures. Recommendations regarding concrete mix design, application of design parameters and on site quality control are presented. Alternative high performance bridge deck schemes are reviewed.

Key concepts: Cracking, Deck, Bridge (graph theory), Bridge deck, Civil engineering, Engineering, Forensic engineering, South carolina

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
REVIEW OF CLASS-E CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS IN SOUTH CAROLINA — Research Paper | ScholarLens