2003•Unpublished venueRequires access

REMEDIATION OF RAILWAY EARTHWORKS

M Straughton

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Arup were commissioned by Network Rail to investigate causes of instability of 6 railway earthworks, comprising two cuttings and four embankments located in the Great Western Zone. Once the cause of instability was established, topographic surveys and ground investigations were completed, and remedial solutions designed. The author was part of the geotechnical team responsible for the identification of the causes of failure and subsequent design of remedial measures. The causes of instability included deep seated instability due to failure of the underlying embankment foundation material, and local instability of ballast at the embankment shoulder caused by raising of track level by routine maintenance of the track over a number of years. The stabilisation method adopted for each site was dependent largely on the mode of failure, underlying geology and the need to maintain the operation of the railway during implementation of the proposed works. Solutions included bored concrete soldier piles with regrading of embankment slopes and the use of shear trenches, a novel form of embankment stabilisation involving deep counterfort drains. The paper concentrates on the geotechnical aspects of the projects, and therefore presents details of three of the six earthworks sites considered. This includes the geometry and geology of the sites, the form of the assumed cause of the instability and details of the proposed remedial works. It also provides a commentary on works implementation through an alliance contractor, and identifies the benefits of this method of design and procurement. For the covering abstract see ITRD E123761.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Arup were commissioned by Network Rail to investigate causes of instability of 6 railway earthworks, comprising two cuttings and four embankments located in the Great Western Zone. Once the cause of instability was established, topographic surveys and ground investigations were completed, and remedial solutions designed. The author was part of the geotechnical team responsible for the identification of the causes of failure and subsequent design of remedial measures. The causes of instability included deep seated instability due to failure of the underlying embankment foundation material, and local instability of ballast at the embankment shoulder caused by raising of track level by routine maintenance of the track over a number of years. The stabilisation method adopted for each site was dependent largely on the mode of failure, underlying geology and the need to maintain the operation of the railway during implementation of the proposed works. Solutions included bored concrete soldier piles with regrading of embankment slopes and the use of shear trenches, a novel form of embankment stabilisation involving deep counterfort drains. The paper concentrates on the geotechnical aspects of the projects, and therefore presents details of three of the six earthworks sites considered. This includes the geometry and geology of the sites, the form of the assumed cause of the instability and details of the proposed remedial works. It also provides a commentary on works implementation through an alliance contractor, and identifies the benefits of this method of design and procurement. For the covering abstract see ITRD E123761.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Arup were commissioned by Network Rail to investigate causes of instability of 6 railway earthworks, comprising two cuttings and four embankments located in the Great Western Zone. Once the cause of instability was established, topographic surveys and ground investigations were completed, and remedial solutions designed. The author was part of the geotechnical team responsible for the identification of the causes of failure and subsequent design of remedial measures. The causes of instability included deep seated instability due to failure of the underlying embankment foundation material, and local instability of ballast at the embankment shoulder caused by raising of track level by routine maintenance of the track over a number of years. The stabilisation method adopted for each site was dependent largely on the mode of failure, underlying geology and the need to maintain the operation of the railway during implementation of the proposed works. Solutions included bored concrete soldier piles with regrading of embankment slopes and the use of shear trenches, a novel form of embankment stabilisation involving deep counterfort drains. The paper concentrates on the geotechnical aspects of the projects, and therefore presents details of three of the six earthworks sites considered. This includes the geometry and geology of the sites, the form of the assumed cause of the instability and details of the proposed remedial works. It also provides a commentary on works implementation through an alliance contractor, and identifies the benefits of this method of design and procurement. For the covering abstract see ITRD E123761.

Key concepts: Earthworks, Levee, Engineering, Geotechnical engineering, Civil engineering, Geotechnical investigation, Foundation (evidence), Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
REMEDIATION OF RAILWAY EARTHWORKS — Research Paper | ScholarLens