2008Transportation Research Board 87th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

Sustainability Footprints, Calculus, and Infrastructure Systems Evaluation

Adjo Amekudzi, C. Jotin Khisty

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The heart of sustainable development lies in the ability to secure a progressively better quality of life for communities while preserving the natural assets that contribute inputs and absorb the byproducts of development. Because different regions around the world may have different regional development priorities, it is reasonable to expect that they could also have different priorities when they consider sustainable development. This paper presents the concepts of the sustainability footprint and sustainability footprint management as tools to introduce spatial and temporal flexibility in meeting sustainable development goals when stakeholders have notably different sustainable development priorities. Such tools can be quite helpful in reaching a consensus on interim goals for sustainable development across regions or other stakeholder entities that have widely different priorities and yet remain committed to global sustainable development in the long term.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The heart of sustainable development lies in the ability to secure a progressively better quality of life for communities while preserving the natural assets that contribute inputs and absorb the byproducts of development. Because different regions around the world may have different regional development priorities, it is reasonable to expect that they could also have different priorities when they consider sustainable development. This paper presents the concepts of the sustainability footprint and sustainability footprint management as tools to introduce spatial and temporal flexibility in meeting sustainable development goals when stakeholders have notably different sustainable development priorities. Such tools can be quite helpful in reaching a consensus on interim goals for sustainable development across regions or other stakeholder entities that have widely different priorities and yet remain committed to global sustainable development in the long term.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The heart of sustainable development lies in the ability to secure a progressively better quality of life for communities while preserving the natural assets that contribute inputs and absorb the byproducts of development. Because different regions around the world may have different regional development priorities, it is reasonable to expect that they could also have different priorities when they consider sustainable development. This paper presents the concepts of the sustainability footprint and sustainability footprint management as tools to introduce spatial and temporal flexibility in meeting sustainable development goals when stakeholders have notably different sustainable development priorities. Such tools can be quite helpful in reaching a consensus on interim goals for sustainable development across regions or other stakeholder entities that have widely different priorities and yet remain committed to global sustainable development in the long term.

Key concepts: Sustainability, Sustainable development, Interim, Ecological footprint, Business, Environmental resource management, Flexibility (engineering), Stakeholder

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sustainability Footprints, Calculus, and Infrastructure Systems Evaluation — Research Paper | ScholarLens