The government's use of the Civil False Claims Act to enforce standards of quality of care: ingenuity or the heavy hand of the 800-pound gorilla.
Michael M. Mustokoff, Jody A. Werner, Michael S. Yecies
Abstract
Michael M. Mustokoff, Jody A. Werner, Michael S. Yecies
Abstract
Fraud and abuse issues abound in health care. A new, rather unique assertion is that submitting a bill for health care that is inadequate constitutes a violation of the Civil False Claims Act. The authors contend that there are more effective and appropriate ways to address poor quality of care, and that using the False Claims Act in this matter is like fitting a square peg in a round hole.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Fraud and abuse issues abound in health care. A new, rather unique assertion is that submitting a bill for health care that is inadequate constitutes a violation of the Civil False Claims Act. The authors contend that there are more effective and appropriate ways to address poor quality of care, and that using the False Claims Act in this matter is like fitting a square peg in a round hole.
Key concepts: Assertion, False Claims Act, Pound (networking), Health care, Ingenuity, Quality (philosophy), Government (linguistics), Law