1976Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

GUIDELINES FOR AGGREGATE TRAVEL PREDICTION USING DISAGGREGATE CHOICE MODELS

Frank S. Koppelman

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

This paper describes procedures for aggregating disaggregate choice models after estimation of the choice model parameters to obtain an aggregated model structure. This structure consists of (a) a disaggregate choice model, (b) a representation of the distribution of explanatory variables, and (c) an aggregation procedure. A taxonomy of aggregation procedures that classifies models according to their structural characteristics is developed. Errors in prediction by use of alternative aggregation procedures are empirically estimated. Analysis of these errors leads to conclusions about the performance of different aggregation procedures. These conclusions suggest the following guidelines for aggregate travel prediction using disaggregate choice models: (a) Disaggregate choice models may be most effectively used for prediction at high levels of aggregation appropriate to policy analysis; (b) enumeration procedures should be used whereever adequate sample data are available, especially at high levels of aggregation; (c) when sample data are not available, classification procedures should be based on the most important class distinction which will be differences in choice set when such differences exist; (d) when data are not available to predict class specific variable values, predictions by the naive procedure should be adjusted for differences in choice set when such differences exist; (e) the specification of the underlying disaggregate choice model should be developed and evaluated with particular car in the grouping of individuals with structurally different choice sets; and (f) incremental prediction should be used for prediction of the expected impacts of policy changes whever an existing set of choice shares is available to use as a basis for adjustment. /Author/

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper describes procedures for aggregating disaggregate choice models after estimation of the choice model parameters to obtain an aggregated model structure. This structure consists of (a) a disaggregate choice model, (b) a representation of the distribution of explanatory variables, and (c) an aggregation procedure. A taxonomy of aggregation procedures that classifies models according to their structural characteristics is developed. Errors in prediction by use of alternative aggregation procedures are empirically estimated. Analysis of these errors leads to conclusions about the performance of different aggregation procedures. These conclusions suggest the following guidelines for aggregate travel prediction using disaggregate choice models: (a) Disaggregate choice models may be most effectively used for prediction at high levels of aggregation appropriate to policy analysis; (b) enumeration procedures should be used whereever adequate sample data are available, especially at high levels of aggregation; (c) when sample data are not available, classification procedures should be based on the most important class distinction which will be differences in choice set when such differences exist; (d) when data are not available to predict class specific variable values, predictions by the naive procedure should be adjusted for differences in choice set when such differences exist; (e) the specification of the underlying disaggregate choice model should be developed and evaluated with particular car in the grouping of individuals with structurally different choice sets; and (f) incremental prediction should be used for prediction of the expected impacts of policy changes whever an existing set of choice shares is available to use as a basis for adjustment. /Author/

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper describes procedures for aggregating disaggregate choice models after estimation of the choice model parameters to obtain an aggregated model structure. This structure consists of (a) a disaggregate choice model, (b) a representation of the distribution of explanatory variables, and (c) an aggregation procedure. A taxonomy of aggregation procedures that classifies models according to their structural characteristics is developed. Errors in prediction by use of alternative aggregation procedures are empirically estimated. Analysis of these errors leads to conclusions about the performance of different aggregation procedures. These conclusions suggest the following guidelines for aggregate travel prediction using disaggregate choice models: (a) Disaggregate choice models may be most effectively used for prediction at high levels of aggregation appropriate to policy analysis; (b) enumeration procedures should be used whereever adequate sample data are available, especially at high levels of aggregation; (c) when sample data are not available, classification procedures should be based on the most important class distinction which will be differences in choice set when such differences exist; (d) when data are not available to predict class specific variable values, predictions by the naive procedure should be adjusted for differences in choice set when such differences exist; (e) the specification of the underlying disaggregate choice model should be developed and evaluated with particular car in the grouping of individuals with structurally different choice sets; and (f) incremental prediction should be used for prediction of the expected impacts of policy changes whever an existing set of choice shares is available to use as a basis for adjustment. /Author/

Key concepts: Aggregate (composite), Choice set, Econometrics, Computer science, Discrete choice, Set (abstract data type), Representation (politics), Class (philosophy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
GUIDELINES FOR AGGREGATE TRAVEL PREDICTION USING DISAGGREGATE CHOICE MODELS — Research Paper | ScholarLens