1999•TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Series BOpen access

Cavitation Performance of Cylindrical Choke for Unsteady Flow. 2nd Report. Comparison of Difference in Inlet Shape of Choke.

Yuri Aoyama, Naoto Watanabe, Masao Yamamoto, Noboru KOIKE, Yoshihiro Matsuoka

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The cavitation performance in a cylindrical choke with a sharp edged-corner was investigated in previous paper. Many differences were detected in cavitation performance by changing the diameter and the length of a choke. The purpose of this paper is to find out in more detail the reason which causes the differences in the cavitation performance. Experiments are carried out using two kinds of cylindrical chokes with a sharp edged-corner and chamfered length at the choke inlet. The pressure distributions at three different locations within the cylindrical choke and just at the back of the choke outlet are measured in the same way as previous paper. As a result, the reason which cavitation performances indicate the phenomena according to shapes and sizes of cylindrical choke has been clarified in more detail as compared with the study before now.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The cavitation performance in a cylindrical choke with a sharp edged-corner was investigated in previous paper. Many differences were detected in cavitation performance by changing the diameter and the length of a choke. The purpose of this paper is to find out in more detail the reason which causes the differences in the cavitation performance. Experiments are carried out using two kinds of cylindrical chokes with a sharp edged-corner and chamfered length at the choke inlet. The pressure distributions at three different locations within the cylindrical choke and just at the back of the choke outlet are measured in the same way as previous paper. As a result, the reason which cavitation performances indicate the phenomena according to shapes and sizes of cylindrical choke has been clarified in more detail as compared with the study before now.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The cavitation performance in a cylindrical choke with a sharp edged-corner was investigated in previous paper. Many differences were detected in cavitation performance by changing the diameter and the length of a choke. The purpose of this paper is to find out in more detail the reason which causes the differences in the cavitation performance. Experiments are carried out using two kinds of cylindrical chokes with a sharp edged-corner and chamfered length at the choke inlet. The pressure distributions at three different locations within the cylindrical choke and just at the back of the choke outlet are measured in the same way as previous paper. As a result, the reason which cavitation performances indicate the phenomena according to shapes and sizes of cylindrical choke has been clarified in more detail as compared with the study before now.

Key concepts: Choke, Cavitation, Inlet, Mechanics, Flow (mathematics), Acoustics, Materials science, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cavitation Performance of Cylindrical Choke for Unsteady Flow. 2nd Report. Comparison of Difference in Inlet Shape of Choke. — Research Paper | ScholarLens