2004˜The œconsultantRequires access

Hematuria: Is it from UTI or something more serious?

Paul Gleich

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The presence of blood in the urine is a significant finding that calls for prompt evaluation. Gross hematuria usually indicates a serious problem; its correlation with malignancy-typically a transitional cell carcinoma-isfairly high. Microscopically detectable blood is less likely to signal a mojor underlying condition; a finding of 0 to 3 red cells per high-power field is probably innocent. The workup for gross and microscopic hematuria focuses on disturbances of urinary tract function and indudes a history and physical examination, urinalysis, rodiologic imaging, urine cytology, and cystoscopy. The presence of hematuria, proteinuria, and rend insufficiency warrants referral to a nephrologist. A search for the cause of microscopic hematuria is much less likely than a workup for gross hematuria to uncover a lifethreatening condition. If the hematuria persists, repeat the urinalysis and cytology every 6 months until the problem resolves or 3 years have passed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The presence of blood in the urine is a significant finding that calls for prompt evaluation. Gross hematuria usually indicates a serious problem; its correlation with malignancy-typically a transitional cell carcinoma-isfairly high. Microscopically detectable blood is less likely to signal a mojor underlying condition; a finding of 0 to 3 red cells per high-power field is probably innocent. The workup for gross and microscopic hematuria focuses on disturbances of urinary tract function and indudes a history and physical examination, urinalysis, rodiologic imaging, urine cytology, and cystoscopy. The presence of hematuria, proteinuria, and rend insufficiency warrants referral to a nephrologist. A search for the cause of microscopic hematuria is much less likely than a workup for gross hematuria to uncover a lifethreatening condition. If the hematuria persists, repeat the urinalysis and cytology every 6 months until the problem resolves or 3 years have passed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The presence of blood in the urine is a significant finding that calls for prompt evaluation. Gross hematuria usually indicates a serious problem; its correlation with malignancy-typically a transitional cell carcinoma-isfairly high. Microscopically detectable blood is less likely to signal a mojor underlying condition; a finding of 0 to 3 red cells per high-power field is probably innocent. The workup for gross and microscopic hematuria focuses on disturbances of urinary tract function and indudes a history and physical examination, urinalysis, rodiologic imaging, urine cytology, and cystoscopy. The presence of hematuria, proteinuria, and rend insufficiency warrants referral to a nephrologist. A search for the cause of microscopic hematuria is much less likely than a workup for gross hematuria to uncover a lifethreatening condition. If the hematuria persists, repeat the urinalysis and cytology every 6 months until the problem resolves or 3 years have passed.

Key concepts: Urinalysis, Medicine, Microscopic hematuria, Urine cytology, Cystoscopy, Gross hematuria, Macroscopic hematuria, Urinary system

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hematuria: Is it from UTI or something more serious? — Research Paper | ScholarLens