2012Transportation Research Board 91st Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

US Household Preferences for Alternative-Fuel Vehicles: Results from a National Survey

Jean‐Daniel Saphores, Hilary Nixon

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This paper analyzes responses to a 2010 national survey of 835 US households to explore consumer preferences among five types of vehicles that differ in propulsion technology (gasoline, hybrid electric (HEV), compressed natural gas (CNG), hydrogen fuel cell (HFC), and electric (EV)), vehicle cost, fuel cost, fuel availability, vehicle range, and CO2 emissions during operation. Although gasoline-fueled vehicles are still preferred, there was strong interest in alternatives to gasoline vehicles, and especially in HEVs, while EVs are least popular. The authors estimated a panel rank-ordered mixed logit model to understand the impact of vehicle characteristics and of the socio-economic characteristics of respondents on their preferences for alternative fuel technologies. With the exception of CNG, respondents prefer alternative propulsion technology in cars as opposed to pick-up trucks, sport utility vehicles (SUV), or minivans. The region where people live is not statistically significant. Education matters only in the case of HEVs, but gender has no significant impact, and the influence of age is technology specific. It was found that environmental attitudes are strong predictors of AFV support, particularly for HFC vehicles and EVs. In addition, the authors elicited trade-offs people are willing to make between vehicle cost, fuel cost, vehicle range, and refueling time. In spite of consumer interest for alternative-fuel vehicles, environmental benefits still take second place to economic considerations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper analyzes responses to a 2010 national survey of 835 US households to explore consumer preferences among five types of vehicles that differ in propulsion technology (gasoline, hybrid electric (HEV), compressed natural gas (CNG), hydrogen fuel cell (HFC), and electric (EV)), vehicle cost, fuel cost, fuel availability, vehicle range, and CO2 emissions during operation. Although gasoline-fueled vehicles are still preferred, there was strong interest in alternatives to gasoline vehicles, and especially in HEVs, while EVs are least popular. The authors estimated a panel rank-ordered mixed logit model to understand the impact of vehicle characteristics and of the socio-economic characteristics of respondents on their preferences for alternative fuel technologies. With the exception of CNG, respondents prefer alternative propulsion technology in cars as opposed to pick-up trucks, sport utility vehicles (SUV), or minivans. The region where people live is not statistically significant. Education matters only in the case of HEVs, but gender has no significant impact, and the influence of age is technology specific. It was found that environmental attitudes are strong predictors of AFV support, particularly for HFC vehicles and EVs. In addition, the authors elicited trade-offs people are willing to make between vehicle cost, fuel cost, vehicle range, and refueling time. In spite of consumer interest for alternative-fuel vehicles, environmental benefits still take second place to economic considerations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper analyzes responses to a 2010 national survey of 835 US households to explore consumer preferences among five types of vehicles that differ in propulsion technology (gasoline, hybrid electric (HEV), compressed natural gas (CNG), hydrogen fuel cell (HFC), and electric (EV)), vehicle cost, fuel cost, fuel availability, vehicle range, and CO2 emissions during operation. Although gasoline-fueled vehicles are still preferred, there was strong interest in alternatives to gasoline vehicles, and especially in HEVs, while EVs are least popular. The authors estimated a panel rank-ordered mixed logit model to understand the impact of vehicle characteristics and of the socio-economic characteristics of respondents on their preferences for alternative fuel technologies. With the exception of CNG, respondents prefer alternative propulsion technology in cars as opposed to pick-up trucks, sport utility vehicles (SUV), or minivans. The region where people live is not statistically significant. Education matters only in the case of HEVs, but gender has no significant impact, and the influence of age is technology specific. It was found that environmental attitudes are strong predictors of AFV support, particularly for HFC vehicles and EVs. In addition, the authors elicited trade-offs people are willing to make between vehicle cost, fuel cost, vehicle range, and refueling time. In spite of consumer interest for alternative-fuel vehicles, environmental benefits still take second place to economic considerations.

Key concepts: Alternative fuel vehicle, Compressed natural gas, Truck, Green vehicle, Gasoline, Miles per gallon gasoline equivalent, Hydrogen vehicle, Fuel efficiency

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
US Household Preferences for Alternative-Fuel Vehicles: Results from a National Survey — Research Paper | ScholarLens