2003•Unpublished venueRequires access

HOW MUCH DO YOU LOSE WHEN YOUR ROAD GOES ON A DIET

Herman F. Huang, Jill R. Stewart, Charles V. Zegeer, Carol Tan Esse

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Transportation engineers and planners may implement road diets with the objective of reducing vehicle speeds and motor-vehicle crashes and injuries. Typical road diets consist of converting four-lane undivided roads into three lanes (two through lanes plus a center turn lane) with the remaining space used for bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and /or on-street parking. This study investigated the actual effects of road diets on motor-vehicle crashes and injuries using data from cities in California and Washington state. A and analysis using a yoked study design of the road diet and comparison sites indicated that the percent of crashes at the road diet sites during the after period was slightly lower than at the comparison sites. Further analysis using a negative binomial model controlling for possible changes in average daily traffic, study period, and other factors indicated no significant treatment effect. Crash severity was virtually the same at road diet and comparison sites. However, there were differences in crash type distributions between road diet and comparison sites but not between before and after periods. Implementation of a road diet should be made on a case-by-case basis where traffic flow, vehicle capacity, and safety are all considered. Also, the effects of road diets should be evaluated further under a variety of traffic and roadway conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Transportation engineers and planners may implement road diets with the objective of reducing vehicle speeds and motor-vehicle crashes and injuries. Typical road diets consist of converting four-lane undivided roads into three lanes (two through lanes plus a center turn lane) with the remaining space used for bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and /or on-street parking. This study investigated the actual effects of road diets on motor-vehicle crashes and injuries using data from cities in California and Washington state. A and analysis using a yoked study design of the road diet and comparison sites indicated that the percent of crashes at the road diet sites during the after period was slightly lower than at the comparison sites. Further analysis using a negative binomial model controlling for possible changes in average daily traffic, study period, and other factors indicated no significant treatment effect. Crash severity was virtually the same at road diet and comparison sites. However, there were differences in crash type distributions between road diet and comparison sites but not between before and after periods. Implementation of a road diet should be made on a case-by-case basis where traffic flow, vehicle capacity, and safety are all considered. Also, the effects of road diets should be evaluated further under a variety of traffic and roadway conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Transportation engineers and planners may implement road diets with the objective of reducing vehicle speeds and motor-vehicle crashes and injuries. Typical road diets consist of converting four-lane undivided roads into three lanes (two through lanes plus a center turn lane) with the remaining space used for bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and /or on-street parking. This study investigated the actual effects of road diets on motor-vehicle crashes and injuries using data from cities in California and Washington state. A and analysis using a yoked study design of the road diet and comparison sites indicated that the percent of crashes at the road diet sites during the after period was slightly lower than at the comparison sites. Further analysis using a negative binomial model controlling for possible changes in average daily traffic, study period, and other factors indicated no significant treatment effect. Crash severity was virtually the same at road diet and comparison sites. However, there were differences in crash type distributions between road diet and comparison sites but not between before and after periods. Implementation of a road diet should be made on a case-by-case basis where traffic flow, vehicle capacity, and safety are all considered. Also, the effects of road diets should be evaluated further under a variety of traffic and roadway conditions.

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Crash, Traffic flow (computer networking), Road traffic, Negative binomial distribution, Motor vehicle crash, Poison control, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
HOW MUCH DO YOU LOSE WHEN YOUR ROAD GOES ON A DIET — Research Paper | ScholarLens