2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Design of Lane Merges at Rural Freeway Construction Work Zones

Brian Wolshon, Sherif Ishak, Wakeel Idewu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Practices for the design and control of work zone traffic control configurations have evolved over time to reflect safer and more efficient management practices. However, they are also recognized as areas of frequent vehicle conflicts that can cause congestion and safety problems. In this research, a new design has been developed that could lessen some of these detrimental effects. This new concept, known as the “joint merge,” simultaneously merges two lanes into one. The key feature of the design is its two-sided taper in which the two adjacent lanes approaching a lane reduction are simultaneously tapered into a single lane with neither lane having a priority. This is theorized to influence drivers into merging in a smooth alternating pattern. To evaluate its operational effects, the joint merge was examined in a work zone in Louisiana and compared to an manual on uniform traffic control devices (MUTCD) conventional merge configuration at the same site. Lane-specific volume and vehicle speeds were collected in the field and the two designs were compared using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and T-test statistical procedures. Overall, the joint merge was found to increase the efficiency of the closed lane and encourage the use of both lanes into the work zone entrance. It was also found that the number of lane changes during low and high-volume periods decreased when the joint merge configuration was used. While no conclusive findings could be made relative to its specific effect on capacity, video recordings and lane usage data suggested that the joint merge strategy was understood and well received by most drivers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Practices for the design and control of work zone traffic control configurations have evolved over time to reflect safer and more efficient management practices. However, they are also recognized as areas of frequent vehicle conflicts that can cause congestion and safety problems. In this research, a new design has been developed that could lessen some of these detrimental effects. This new concept, known as the “joint merge,” simultaneously merges two lanes into one. The key feature of the design is its two-sided taper in which the two adjacent lanes approaching a lane reduction are simultaneously tapered into a single lane with neither lane having a priority. This is theorized to influence drivers into merging in a smooth alternating pattern. To evaluate its operational effects, the joint merge was examined in a work zone in Louisiana and compared to an manual on uniform traffic control devices (MUTCD) conventional merge configuration at the same site. Lane-specific volume and vehicle speeds were collected in the field and the two designs were compared using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and T-test statistical procedures. Overall, the joint merge was found to increase the efficiency of the closed lane and encourage the use of both lanes into the work zone entrance. It was also found that the number of lane changes during low and high-volume periods decreased when the joint merge configuration was used. While no conclusive findings could be made relative to its specific effect on capacity, video recordings and lane usage data suggested that the joint merge strategy was understood and well received by most drivers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Practices for the design and control of work zone traffic control configurations have evolved over time to reflect safer and more efficient management practices. However, they are also recognized as areas of frequent vehicle conflicts that can cause congestion and safety problems. In this research, a new design has been developed that could lessen some of these detrimental effects. This new concept, known as the “joint merge,” simultaneously merges two lanes into one. The key feature of the design is its two-sided taper in which the two adjacent lanes approaching a lane reduction are simultaneously tapered into a single lane with neither lane having a priority. This is theorized to influence drivers into merging in a smooth alternating pattern. To evaluate its operational effects, the joint merge was examined in a work zone in Louisiana and compared to an manual on uniform traffic control devices (MUTCD) conventional merge configuration at the same site. Lane-specific volume and vehicle speeds were collected in the field and the two designs were compared using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and T-test statistical procedures. Overall, the joint merge was found to increase the efficiency of the closed lane and encourage the use of both lanes into the work zone entrance. It was also found that the number of lane changes during low and high-volume periods decreased when the joint merge configuration was used. While no conclusive findings could be made relative to its specific effect on capacity, video recordings and lane usage data suggested that the joint merge strategy was understood and well received by most drivers.

Key concepts: Merge (version control), SAFER, Computer science, Transport engineering, Simulation, Engineering, Computer security, Information retrieval

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Design of Lane Merges at Rural Freeway Construction Work Zones — Research Paper | ScholarLens