1988Unpublished venueRequires access

Stripping in HMA Mixtures: State-of-the-Art and Critical Review of Test Methods

Badru M Kiggundu, Freddy L. Roberts

Open publisher page 170 citations

Abstract

This report presents review summaries of the state-of-the-art regarding stripping in hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures. The review stresses efforts concerned with methods development and evaluation, and presents a critical review of select methods including Lottman (NCHRP 246), Tunnicliff-Root (NCHRP 274), Immersion Compression, 10-Minute Boil Test, and the Nevada Dynamic Strip Method. The results of the critical review of methods indicated the following ranking order: Lottman Test, Tunnicliff-Root Test, 10-Minute Boil Test, Immersion Compression, and Nevada Dynamic Strip Test. The basis of the analysis was a proposed success/failure pattern which was developed using published data on stripping. Other products of this research include: proposed relationship between stripping theories and mechanisms, and an appended summary of findings from surveys of the users of the stripping tests.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report presents review summaries of the state-of-the-art regarding stripping in hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures. The review stresses efforts concerned with methods development and evaluation, and presents a critical review of select methods including Lottman (NCHRP 246), Tunnicliff-Root (NCHRP 274), Immersion Compression, 10-Minute Boil Test, and the Nevada Dynamic Strip Method. The results of the critical review of methods indicated the following ranking order: Lottman Test, Tunnicliff-Root Test, 10-Minute Boil Test, Immersion Compression, and Nevada Dynamic Strip Test. The basis of the analysis was a proposed success/failure pattern which was developed using published data on stripping. Other products of this research include: proposed relationship between stripping theories and mechanisms, and an appended summary of findings from surveys of the users of the stripping tests.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 170 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report presents review summaries of the state-of-the-art regarding stripping in hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures. The review stresses efforts concerned with methods development and evaluation, and presents a critical review of select methods including Lottman (NCHRP 246), Tunnicliff-Root (NCHRP 274), Immersion Compression, 10-Minute Boil Test, and the Nevada Dynamic Strip Method. The results of the critical review of methods indicated the following ranking order: Lottman Test, Tunnicliff-Root Test, 10-Minute Boil Test, Immersion Compression, and Nevada Dynamic Strip Test. The basis of the analysis was a proposed success/failure pattern which was developed using published data on stripping. Other products of this research include: proposed relationship between stripping theories and mechanisms, and an appended summary of findings from surveys of the users of the stripping tests.

Key concepts: Stripping (fiber), Ranking (information retrieval), Asphalt, Test (biology), Forensic engineering, Engineering, Computer science, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Stripping in HMA Mixtures: State-of-the-Art and Critical Review of Test Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens