1974Journal of the Construction DivisionRequires access

Subsurface Construction Contracts—A Contractor's View

George A. Fox

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The number of conflicts, amount of claims and litigation, and the number of established heavy construction contractors who suffer heavy losses or go out of business demonstrates that the contracts and specifications do not provide an adequate meeting of the minds. Changes in contracts and specifications are overdue and necessary to improve the construction industry. No responsible contractor will argue against detailed language in performance standards. Even under the present framework, modifications of certain built-in areas of conflict can be made, i.e., subsurface information, utilities, earth support structures, dewatering, piles, compressed air, tunnel lining and rock support, decision making, approvals, and claims, which will make contracts and specifications less one-sided, onerous, and punitive from the contractor's view. Conflict is not solved by more rules which intensify the conflict. It is now time to redress the relationship between contractor and owner.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The number of conflicts, amount of claims and litigation, and the number of established heavy construction contractors who suffer heavy losses or go out of business demonstrates that the contracts and specifications do not provide an adequate meeting of the minds. Changes in contracts and specifications are overdue and necessary to improve the construction industry. No responsible contractor will argue against detailed language in performance standards. Even under the present framework, modifications of certain built-in areas of conflict can be made, i.e., subsurface information, utilities, earth support structures, dewatering, piles, compressed air, tunnel lining and rock support, decision making, approvals, and claims, which will make contracts and specifications less one-sided, onerous, and punitive from the contractor's view. Conflict is not solved by more rules which intensify the conflict. It is now time to redress the relationship between contractor and owner.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The number of conflicts, amount of claims and litigation, and the number of established heavy construction contractors who suffer heavy losses or go out of business demonstrates that the contracts and specifications do not provide an adequate meeting of the minds. Changes in contracts and specifications are overdue and necessary to improve the construction industry. No responsible contractor will argue against detailed language in performance standards. Even under the present framework, modifications of certain built-in areas of conflict can be made, i.e., subsurface information, utilities, earth support structures, dewatering, piles, compressed air, tunnel lining and rock support, decision making, approvals, and claims, which will make contracts and specifications less one-sided, onerous, and punitive from the contractor's view. Conflict is not solved by more rules which intensify the conflict. It is now time to redress the relationship between contractor and owner.

Key concepts: Redress, Punitive damages, Construction management, Construction industry, Construction contract, Construction engineering, Engineering, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Subsurface Construction Contracts—A Contractor's View — Research Paper | ScholarLens