2000Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)Requires access

Nitrate leaching following cultivation of contrasting temporary grassland.

Jørgen Eriksen, Karen Søegaard

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The N-surplus in grazed grassland is much higher than in cut grassland. Therefore, the residual effects of three years of temporary grassland on nitrate leaching in the following cereal crop were determined. Grassland managements were either cut leys or grazing with dairy cows in both pure grass and grass-clover mixtures. The cows were fed two levels of N in the supplements. Grassland management had little effect on the subsequent nitrate leaching, which ranged from 6 to 36 kg N ha-1, even though the surplus after three years of grassland ranged from 36 to 984 kg N ha-1. This indicates that substantial losses occurred during the grassland period. Application of fertiliser-N to the cereals had a much larger effect on nitrate leaching. It is concluded that management in the first years following grassland cultivation is of considerable importance in reducing nitrate leaching losses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The N-surplus in grazed grassland is much higher than in cut grassland. Therefore, the residual effects of three years of temporary grassland on nitrate leaching in the following cereal crop were determined. Grassland managements were either cut leys or grazing with dairy cows in both pure grass and grass-clover mixtures. The cows were fed two levels of N in the supplements. Grassland management had little effect on the subsequent nitrate leaching, which ranged from 6 to 36 kg N ha-1, even though the surplus after three years of grassland ranged from 36 to 984 kg N ha-1. This indicates that substantial losses occurred during the grassland period. Application of fertiliser-N to the cereals had a much larger effect on nitrate leaching. It is concluded that management in the first years following grassland cultivation is of considerable importance in reducing nitrate leaching losses.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The N-surplus in grazed grassland is much higher than in cut grassland. Therefore, the residual effects of three years of temporary grassland on nitrate leaching in the following cereal crop were determined. Grassland managements were either cut leys or grazing with dairy cows in both pure grass and grass-clover mixtures. The cows were fed two levels of N in the supplements. Grassland management had little effect on the subsequent nitrate leaching, which ranged from 6 to 36 kg N ha-1, even though the surplus after three years of grassland ranged from 36 to 984 kg N ha-1. This indicates that substantial losses occurred during the grassland period. Application of fertiliser-N to the cereals had a much larger effect on nitrate leaching. It is concluded that management in the first years following grassland cultivation is of considerable importance in reducing nitrate leaching losses.

Key concepts: Grassland, Leaching (pedology), Agronomy, Grazing, Environmental science, Nitrate, Soil water, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nitrate leaching following cultivation of contrasting temporary grassland. — Research Paper | ScholarLens